Teams

Bartens-Khairallah

2023 Leon Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-30vs RagsdaleWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristine Khairallah / Fang Liang vs Kelly Tucker / Denise Whitlock3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-11-16vs HerringWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristine Khairallah / Fang Liang vs Kathy Beggs / Karen de Cardenas6-4, 6-3
2023-11-09vs RagsdaleWon 20
W#2 DoublesMariela Bartens / Lisa Franson vs Susan Ragsdale / Sharon Dailey6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristine Khairallah / Fang Liang vs Susan Emmanuel / Denise Whitlock6-0, 6-2
2023-11-02vs Byler-BushWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathy Maus / Fang Liang vs Vickie Morgan-Gates / Scarlet Curtis6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNancy Donahue / Kristine Khairallah vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-26vs HerringWon 10
W#2 DoublesMariela Bartens / Lisa Franson vs Sherry Cady / Brenda Jahn6-1, 6-2
2023-10-19vs RagsdaleWon 20
W#1 DoublesMariela Bartens / Fang Liang vs Kim Nichols / Elizabeth Hawkins2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPia Lehtonen / Denean Sykes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-12vs Byler-BushLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathy Maus / Xiaobing Zhang vs Scarlet Curtis / Chansamone Bryant2-2
2023-10-05vs HerringSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristine Khairallah / Fang Liang vs Rhonda Tullos / Sherry Cady6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMariela Bartens / Pia Lehtonen vs Brenda Jahn / Michelle Eubanks1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Fang Liang
published 4
3.75
Elizabeth Murray
published 4
3.60
Lisa Franson
published
3.57
Pia Lehtonen
published
3.33
Mariela Bartens
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Nancy Donahue
published
Denean Sykes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Kathy Maus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kristine Khairallah
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristine Khairallah + Kathy Maus3348% gamesnot enough data
Kristine Khairallah + Mariela Bartens303 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Franson + Elizabeth Murray033 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Franson + Pia Lehtonen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Fang Liang
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Elizabeth Murray
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Lisa Franson
31W–24L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Pia Lehtonen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Mariela Bartens
67W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Nancy Donahue
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Denean Sykes
40W–50L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Kathy Maus
109W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Kristine Khairallah
79W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.