Teams

West Shore - Wilfong

2022 USTA 40 & Over League · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-15vs RCW - HufnagelLost 03
L#1 DoublesDawn Toutkaldjian / Karen Burleson vs Bonnie Westheaffer / Tammy Miller2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Malinoski vs Kelly Flatt0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLois Jernigan / Karis Hazam vs Abby Aukamp / Kelly Kurtz1-6, 0-6
2022-08-07vs Hershey - CorcoranLost 12
W#1 DoublesJane Ackerman / Dawn Toutkaldjian vs Shannon Corcoran / Nicole Nikolaus6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Malinoski vs Sue Shema1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSheryl Behr / Karis Hazam vs Sherry Greer / Lori Tully6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-07-31vs Hempfield - HuntLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Burleson / Dawn Toutkaldjian vs Nina Beecher / Lori Hunt4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Malinoski vs Susan Eurich0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJane Ackerman / Karis Hazam vs Tracey Cousins-Ledwidge / Susan Danowski-Miller4-6, 1-6
2022-07-16vs Hempfield - SchlageterLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Wilfong / Dawn Toutkaldjian vs Teresa Clark / Audrey Lubas6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLaura Malinoski vs Dale Heird1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLois Jernigan / Sheryl Behr vs Maureen McElrone / Cathy Tobin4-6, 5-7
2022-07-10vs Harrisburg Academy - HopLost 13
W#1 DoublesKaren Burleson / Dawn Toutkaldjian vs Melissa Ruggiero / Sowmya Surapaneni6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Malinoski vs Anna Jacobs4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSheryl Behr / Cindy Wilfong vs Jennifer Ball / Carolyn Hopwood3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaris Hazam / Lois Jernigan vs Bonnie Bentz / Ellen Goldsmith6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-30vs Hempfield - ForreyLost 12
L#1 DoublesDawn Toutkaldjian / Cindy Wilfong vs Iris Lehman / Audrey Troop4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJane Ackerman / Sheryl Behr vs Heather Hershey / Catherine Ingram5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLois Jernigan / Laura Malinoski vs Becky Katz / Marla Triano1-6, 2-6
2022-06-21vs Hempfield - CovellLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Wilfong / Dawn Toutkaldjian vs Danielle Salsbury / Nancy Opilo6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCindee Trapp vs Michele Mccartney4-3
L#2 DoublesJane Ackerman / Lois Jernigan vs Karen Schaufert / Barbara Newman4-6, 0-6
2022-06-14vs Wisehaven - MichelsLost 12
L#1 DoublesLois Jernigan / Laura Malinoski vs Lynne Beck / Darlene Ashwood2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJane Ackerman / Sheryl Behr vs Angela Witta / Meg Westenberger5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Wilfong / Karis Hazam vs Julie Schedin / Nonglak Steele6-3, 6-3
2022-05-22vs Hershey - Cocoa BombsWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Burleson / Dawn Toutkaldjian vs Diane Glass / Mridula Mishra6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCindee Trapp vs Meg Rogers6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaris Hazam / Cindy Wilfong vs Ann Lady / Maria Salinger6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLois Jernigan / Laura Malinoski vs Susan Fridirici / Jillian Keller3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Cindee Trapp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.68
Dawn Toutkaldjian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Jane Ackerman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.33
Kristie Teets
published 3.5
3.25
Lois Jernigan
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.08
Laura Malinoski
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #1 Singles 35% · published 3.5
Cindy Wilfong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Karen Burleson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Karis Hazam
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sheryl Behr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindee Trapp + Dawn Toutkaldjian131349% games+1.3% vs expected
Cindy Wilfong + Jane Ackerman4355% games+0.8% vs expected
Karen Burleson + Dawn Toutkaldjian15460% games−4.8% vs expected
Lois Jernigan + Laura Malinoski1837% games−6.8% vs expected
Cindy Wilfong + Dawn Toutkaldjian5259% gamesnot enough data
Karen Burleson + Cindee Trapp314 matchesnot enough data
Lois Jernigan + Kristie Teets134 matchesnot enough data
Kristie Teets + Laura Malinoski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindee Trapp
115W–100L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Dawn Toutkaldjian
182W–118L career · 8 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Jane Ackerman
29W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Kristie Teets
86W–71L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Lois Jernigan
110W–191L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Laura Malinoski
34W–81L career · 17 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Cindy Wilfong
23W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Burleson
42W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karis Hazam
4W–11L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheryl Behr
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.