Teams

Hidden Hills - Woolf

2025 Duval Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-08-08vs Sawgrass - WerbaWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Jahn / William Jahn vs Melissa Knarr / Daniel Ostfeld6-3, 6-4
2025-08-07vs JBTC - LombardoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Jahn / Chris Pruitt vs Debbie Bucca / Dominick Bucca4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Taylor / William Jahn vs Patricia Lombardo / M Delahunty6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-31vs Glen Kernan - KayeLost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Pruitt / Michelle Jahn vs Christi Bisson / Jesse Cancel3-6, 4-6
2025-07-18vs Jack Russell - BurleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Jahn / Chris Pruitt vs Brian McIntire / Christina Jordan2-6, 4-6
2025-07-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Jahn / William Jahn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-20vs Julington Creek - CarrLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Jahn / William Jahn vs Simona Gavaller / Jeff Prieto4-6, 4-6
2025-06-18vs Duval/Fricke/18&Over7.0MXDLost 02
L#2 DoublesMichelle Jahn / Nathan Green vs Polly Curole / Andy Fricke2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRina Rosada / William Jahn vs Heather Parrish / Jesse Rogers0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-02vs Duval/Davidson/18&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#1 DoublesGuillory Vic / Michelle Jahn vs Andrew Swartz / Sarah Davidson3-6, 2-6
2025-05-30vs Eagle Landing - BrinkLost 02
L#2 DoublesNathan Green / Michelle Jahn vs James Letson / Kendall Taylor5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRina Rosada / William Jahn vs Marshall Knight / Kristi Emmet3-6, 3-6
2025-05-16vs San Jose - CochranWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris Pruitt / Michelle Jahn vs Cynthia Hack / Thomas Hack7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Michelle Jahn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.27
Chris Pruitt
published 3.5
Michael Griffith
published
Natalie Deen
published
Rina Rosada
published
Shawn Stoddard
published
Susan Parisi
published
William Jahn
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Jahn + William Jahn4357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Jahn
68W–143L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Chris Pruitt
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Michael Griffith
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Deen
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rina Rosada
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Stoddard
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Parisi
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Jahn
24W–35L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.