Teams

WOB:Woburn Red:Borelli/Gianino

2025 EMA Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-22vs WOB:Awesome:Hoffman/CallevaLost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Gianino / Maura Brescia vs Amanda Lubarsky / Nancy Dou2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAlison Borelli vs Heather Condurso4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLaurel Carey / Marika Whaley vs Florence Morin / Katherine Cruise1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJana Dolnikova / Meg McCauley vs Jennifer Roy / Melanie Bedrosian6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-07-15vs WOB:Woburn Kats:GoodmanSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJana Dolnikova / Irene Fassler vs Joanne Reilly / Deborah Wilson5-7, 2-5
L#1 SinglesAlison Borelli vs Melba Chin2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesErin Barrett / Mary Decourcey vs Ouliana Bashinova / Teresa McCarthy6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Gianino / Kumiko Ide vs Jacquelyn Santini / Courtney Park2-6, 3-6
2025-07-09vs WOB:Woburn:Blender/BurkeWon 31
L#1 DoublesIrene Fassler / Heather Baiany vs Marcia Koury / Andrea Pion0-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAlison Borelli vs Katharine Zupan6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Decourcey / Elizabeth Gianino vs Jennifer Hillery / Liza Webster4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Ellen Maloney / Meg McCauley vs Bara Blender / Holly Clifford1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-08vs WTC:Winchester:WagnerPritchardLost 04
L#1 DoublesMaura Brescia / Irene Fassler vs Michal D'Antonio / Alison Conlon6-7, 3-5
L#1 SinglesAlison Borelli vs Thong Pritchard3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Gianino / Mary Decourcey vs Christina Terranova / Linda Ellis1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Ellen Maloney / Meg McCauley vs Csilla Gyurko / Liz Dunn1-6, 4-6
2025-07-01vs WOB:Woburn Blue:HouLost 13
L#1 DoublesHeather Baiany / Irene Fassler vs Jie Bai / HU CHEN3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAlison Borelli vs Weihua Wang6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMaura Brescia / Kumiko Ide vs Dan Wang / Ashley Waring1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Decourcey / Mary Ellen Maloney vs Sandra Eisenbies / Yaliang Zhao4-6, 3-5
2025-06-17vs WOB:Awesome:Hoffman/CallevaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKumiko Ide / Irene Fassler vs Amanda Lubarsky / Kieran Wong1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMarika Whaley vs Stacy Moran7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Gianino / Maura Brescia vs Linda Calleva / Mana HOFFMANN6-7, 4-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMeg McCauley / MaryEllen Walsh vs Nancy Dou / Danielle Millett1-6, 2-6
2025-06-10vs WOB:Woburn Kats:GoodmanLost 13
W#1 DoublesHeather Baiany / Laura Remington vs Joanne Reilly / Carolyn Goodman6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMarika Whaley vs Melba Chin1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJana Dolnikova / Laurel Carey vs Teresa McCarthy / Ouliana Bashinova2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAmy Hugh / Margaret Kiladjian vs Denise Gallagher / Joan Matteuzzi1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-03vs WTC:Winchester:WagnerPritchardSplit 22
L#1 DoublesErin Barrett / Jana Dolnikova vs Emily Kirk / Christina Terranova6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAlison Borelli vs Michal D'Antonio7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Gianino / Mary Decourcey vs Andrea Loeb / Lynda Tocci6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Baiany / Meg McCauley vs Beth Caplow / Thong Pritchard4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-27vs WOB:Woburn Blue:HouWon 31
W#1 DoublesHeather Baiany / Laura Remington vs Jun Yu / Weihua Wang6-3, 6-5
W#1 SinglesMarika Whaley vs Young Rasmussen6-2, 5-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaura Brescia / Kumiko Ide vs HU CHEN / Lingfei Hou4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Ellen Maloney / Meg McCauley vs Yaliang Zhao / Sandra Eisenbies6-4, 6-4
2025-05-20vs WOB:Woburn:Blender/BurkeLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Baiany / Laura Remington vs Miao Gao / Maureen Mullen4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesErin Barrett / Margaret Kiladjian vs Bara Blender / Rachel Reeds2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Gianino / Amy Hugh vs Holly Clifford / Robin Ross4-6, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings37 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LAK:Lakeville Blue:Levine/Kelleher0827519219
2NEW:The Smashers:Page/van Vliet08221023234
3MLTC:Marcus Lewis TC:Witty0824823211
4DED:40Love:Deng0823923254
5NETC:Queens of the Court/Rogers08201227261
6LFNT:Pink Ladies 3.5:Lord/Bradford08191328254
7KIG:5K:Meyer/Sampson08201228259
8W109:Sets in the City:Klein/Divincenzo08201230265
9NETC:Double the Fun:Valyo/Welcom08151737271
10BRCC:Black Rock:/Waterbury08131942296
11WEY:Weymouth:Garrow08141842310
12COH:Cohasset Hatherly/Briggs08122043307
13WESB:Westboro:Nichols/Norman-Clancy08122044316
14BBC:Brown Billone:Curran/Donovan08112144302
15W109:Lady Knights:Broderick/Alcorn08112148316
16WAY:Wayside:Hardimon/Pulnik0892350331
17SSY:SSYMCA Blue:Norton/McHugh0882450321
18IRCC:Indian Ridge:Edelmann/Evans0862654355
19STC:Sportsmen's:Cutter/Coppola0872554342
20LFW:Racquettes:Fordiani/Williams0930617235
21SFT:Spark Green:Barry0928819198
22CED:Terminetters:Cavallini09231332275
23SRF:Scituate Blue:Horne09221433299
24BRTC:Bass River:Hoyle/Healey09211535310
25SSY:SSYMCA Red:Johnson/Baker09211537303
26BGTC:NDNA:Ready09201639327
27KIGM:Kingsbury Medfied:Barker09181840315
28W109:Wimbledon 109:Hsu09152146340
29BRTC:Fireballs:Dennehy/Licciardi09122452351
30DED:Dedham Dream Team:Kruglak/Randall0992757378
31MAC:Team Laurie:Tierney/Wick0982860394
32WTC:Winchester:WagnerPritchard010261432331
33WOB:Awesome:Hoffman/Calleva010251535304
34WOB:Woburn Blue:Hou010221842341
35WOB:Woburn:Blender/Burke010192149377
36WOB:Woburn Red:Borelli/Gianino010162458404
37WOB:Woburn Kats:Goodman010122859408

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Alison Borelli
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Heather Baiany
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.32
Mary Decourcey
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
3.29
Laura Remington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Jana Dolnikova
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Amy Hugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Marika Whaley
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Maura Brescia
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.13
Irene Fassler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Erin Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Mary Ellen Maloney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Elizabeth Gianino
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.01
Kumiko Ide
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Meg McCauley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laurel Carey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Coombs
published
Margaret Kiladjian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
MaryEllen Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marika Whaley + Jana Dolnikova4255% games+8.6% vs expected
Meg McCauley + Mary Ellen Maloney3842% games−1.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Gianino + Mary Decourcey6451% games−5.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Gianino + Alison Borelli4747% games−7.6% vs expected
MaryEllen Walsh + Alison Borelli2350% gamesnot enough data
Jana Dolnikova + Irene Fassler2354% gamesnot enough data
Erin Barrett + Jana Dolnikova224 matchesnot enough data
Amy Hugh + Irene Fassler134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alison Borelli
43W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Heather Baiany
29W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
Mary Decourcey
16W–23L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Laura Remington
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Jana Dolnikova
32W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amy Hugh
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marika Whaley
39W–103L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Maura Brescia
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Irene Fassler
28W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Erin Barrett
29W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Mary Ellen Maloney
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Elizabeth Gianino
22W–72L career · 7 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Kumiko Ide
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Meg McCauley
25W–56L career · 6 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Laurel Carey
64W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Coombs
0W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Kiladjian
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
MaryEllen Walsh
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.