Teams

Slice Girls

2025 Corpus Christi 55 & Over USTA League · Ladies 6.0

7 players · average NTRP 2.80 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-01-22vs Simply 55Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAngie Britton / Diana Soto vs Darlene Murry / Deborah Johnson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesClaudia Lichtenberger / Elizabeth Cosgrove vs Jessica Fitch / Sheri Gagliano3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Becquet / Christy Berry vs Tina Gonzales / Susan Apacible2-6, 3-6
2025-01-22vs Simply 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Shiner / Angie Britton vs Carolyn Orgill / Jessica Fitch6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Cosgrove / Claudia Lichtenberger vs Tina Gonzales / Diana Keeler6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDiana Soto / Christy Berry vs Darlene Murry / Deborah Johnson5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Lynn Shiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Angie Britton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Elizabeth Cosgrove
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Claudia Lichtenberger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Diana Soto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Christy Berry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.12
Debbie Becquet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Britton + Elizabeth Cosgrove0718% games−17.2% vs expected
Christy Berry + Debbie Becquet044 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Cosgrove + Claudia Lichtenberger224 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Shiner + Angie Britton123 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Becquet + Claudia Lichtenberger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Shiner
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Angie Britton
14W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Elizabeth Cosgrove
17W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Claudia Lichtenberger
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Diana Soto
14W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.40
2.5
Christy Berry
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Debbie Becquet
4W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.