Teams

MLF GREEN

2023 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - NOCO · WOMEN 2.5 - NOCO

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-18vs LT BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Byrne / Cris Alsum vs Elizabeth Brown / Jennifer Erickson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristin Henninger vs Tiffany Croci5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Geserick / Rene Moore vs Sarah Wishall / Sandra Hume5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2023-07-11vs FCCC WHITELost 01
L#1 DoublesCris Alsum / Melissa Byrne vs Maria Irianni Renno / Jana Burns5-7, 3-6
2023-07-07vs MLF PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Henninger / Melissa Byrne vs Sage Snowdon / Amanda Snowdon0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCris Alsum vs Stephanie Laramore4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Taylor / Carol Geserick vs Kristi van Buren / Magdalena Joyce1-6, 0-6
2023-06-27vs HMTC YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKristin Henninger vs Mary Hulse2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMelissa Byrne / Carol Geserick vs Angelika Lintner / Allison Miller6-3, 6-3
2023-06-20vs LT REDSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCris Alsum vs Sarah Kaplan6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarol Geserick / Kristin Henninger vs Kay Lucas / Tal Bloom4-6, 3-6
2023-06-13vs LT BLUESplit 11
L#1 SinglesCris Alsum vs Tiffany Croci3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKristin Henninger / Carol Geserick vs Deanna Bekkedahl / Milena Perrine6-3, 3-1
2023-06-06vs FCCC WHITEWon 20
W#1 SinglesCris Alsum vs Christina Baker6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelissa Byrne / Carol Geserick vs Amanda Haygood / Ashley McLaughlin7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LT RED5214718163
2MLF GREEN52111024210
3FCCC WHITE3491228199
4LT BLUE3491228206
5HMTC YELLOW0751634230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cris Alsum
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Carol Geserick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Henninger
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Laura Guin
published
Melissa Byrne
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Henninger + Melissa Byrne4448% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Henninger + Carol Geserick213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Byrne + Carol Geserick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Cris Alsum
19W–13L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Carol Geserick
11W–10L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristin Henninger
16W–10L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Guin
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Byrne
17W–18L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.