Teams

Lee/Forbis - CCNC

2022 Sandhills Adult 18 & over · 3.0 Adult Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-16vs Parks/Stout - HighlandLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrooke Swaim vs Jennifer Joeckel5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVirginia Forbis / Cornelia Morris vs Serriah Ciccone / Jessica Kouba5-7, 4-6
2022-05-10vs Klinck - Mazarick ParkSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCornelia Morris / Michele Santiago vs Amanda Klinck / Lauren Blashford3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesBrooke Swaim vs Caroline Hasty6-2, 6-3
2022-05-03vs Rouse - Gates FourWon 10
W#2 SinglesBrooke Swaim vs Clare OKeeffe6-2, 6-2
2022-04-06vs Brooks - Pinehurst Tennis ClubWon 10
W#2 SinglesBrooke Swaim vs Lorin Johnson6-2, 6-2
2022-03-27vs Parks/Stout - HighlandWon 20
W#2 SinglesBrooke Swaim vs Nicole Burkhart7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCornelia Morris / Michele Santiago vs Martha Lerario / Esther Thompson6-4, 6-3
2022-03-22vs Klinck - Mazarick ParkWon 10
W#2 SinglesBrooke Swaim vs Lydia Apollo6-1, 6-1
2022-03-15vs Rouse - Gates FourLost 01
L#3 DoublesCornelia Morris / Catherine Robinette vs Denise Bauer Frazier / Clare OKeeffe6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Brooke Swaim
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.70
Leigh Carter
published
3.45
Shannon Allison
published
3.12
Michele Santiago
published
2.91
Louise Lucas
published
2.77
Virginia Forbis
published
2.77
Meagan Lee
published
2.72
Donna Hicks
published 3
2.69
2.67
Cornelia Morris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Michele Keel
published
Pamela Gantt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Keel + Virginia Forbis6158% gamesnot enough data
Louise Lucas + Cornelia Morris033 matchesnot enough data
Cornelia Morris + Catherine Robinette123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brooke Swaim
71W–17L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
Leigh Carter
29W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Shannon Allison
31W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
Michele Santiago
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
Louise Lucas
8W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Virginia Forbis
23W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Meagan Lee
12W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Donna Hicks
17W–13L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Catherine Robinette
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Cornelia Morris
51W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
Michele Keel
11W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Gantt
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.