Teams

San Antonio: Serves You Right

2023 18 & Over Little State · Ladies 3.0 Flight

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ladies 3.0 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Amanda Reed
published 3.5
3.28
Sarah Naylor
published
3.18
Jami Painter
published 3.5
3.14
Melissa Munson
published
3.13
Lidiane Bridges
published
3.10
Abby Holahan
published 3.5
3.03
Marissa Wood
published
2.82
Julia Vlahos
published
2.80
Claire Coco
published 3
Amy Payne
published 3
Erica Jones
published 3
2.69
Renee Weatherford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Munson + Amanda Reed6455% games+8.8% vs expected
Sarah Naylor + Lidiane Bridges6165% games+4.0% vs expected
Renee Weatherford + Claire Coco213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Reed
41W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.38
Sarah Naylor
27W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Jami Painter
16W–23L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Melissa Munson
23W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
3.14
Lidiane Bridges
35W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.13
3.5
Abby Holahan
20W–16L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Marissa Wood
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.03
Julia Vlahos
6W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Claire Coco
23W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Amy Payne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Erica Jones
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Renee Weatherford
15W–27L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.