Teams

UPTA65A/Frazier/Riverside

2025 UPTA Adult 65 & Over - SC · 65+ Men - 4.0

8 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-04vs UPTA65A/Dickey/KrocWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Tindall / Mark Craig vs Stephen Henry / John Bird6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn McCoy / Gary Bible vs Calhoun Mays / Scott Dickey6-2, 6-3
2025-05-24vs UPTA65A/Cooper/BrookstoneWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Craig / Michael Tindall vs Mark Wright / Mark Curin7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDonald Barton / Harry Luthi vs Kyle Langill / Bruce Brenkus2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJohn McCoy / Gary Bible vs Lucien Woorons / Mark Peterman6-3, 6-2
2025-05-10vs UPTA65A/Thomason/KrocWon 21
L#1 DoublesSteven Anderson / John Warden vs Michael Thomason / MacK Thomason2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Tindall / Mark Craig vs Rick Ezell / Scott Juvelier5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGary Bible / John McCoy vs Barney Pannell / Bill Kreger2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-03vs UPTA65A/Smith/Spindle TreeSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSteven Anderson / Donald Barton vs Rodger Coubrough / Kirk Villar4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMark Craig / Michael Tindall vs Larry Smith / Jim Wood4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65+ Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
John Warden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Harry Luthi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Michael Tindall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
Gary Bible
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Donald Barton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
John McCoy
published
Mark Craig
published
Rocky Chapman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John McCoy + Gary Bible4349% gamesnot enough data
Mark Craig + Michael Tindall2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Warden
22W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Harry Luthi
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Michael Tindall
17W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Gary Bible
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Donald Barton
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
John McCoy
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Craig
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rocky Chapman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.