Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/18+M(Orozco)(TW)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.70 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Albert Lanza
published 4
3.54
Alex Trachter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Carlos de Regules
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 3.5
Abraham Celaya
published 3.5
3.22
Adam Rosenfield
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Eric Desbois
published
Eric Swanson
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Gervasio Verdaguer
published
Jared Jones
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Jesus Manuel Alvidrez
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jimmy Prince
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Olac Fuentes
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Osvaldo Orozco
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published
Trevor Rivera
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Will Silverstein
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Yevgenko Makarov
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gervasio Verdaguer + Osvaldo Orozco3251% games−1.5% vs expected
Trevor Rivera + Carlos de Regules7255% games−2.6% vs expected
Alex Trachter + Albert Lanza9655% games−8.9% vs expected
Trevor Rivera + Eric Swanson12950% gamesnot enough data
Carlos de Regules + Yevgenko Makarov9648% gamesnot enough data
Carlos de Regules + Eric Desbois2546% gamesnot enough data
Jesus Manuel Alvidrez + Abraham Celaya0732% gamesnot enough data
Carlos de Regules + Osvaldo Orozco2440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Albert Lanza
29W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Alex Trachter
35W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Carlos de Regules
79W–83L career · 29 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Abraham Celaya
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Adam Rosenfield
11W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Eric Desbois
55W–45L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Eric Swanson
58W–43L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gervasio Verdaguer
60W–38L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jared Jones
41W–21L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jesus Manuel Alvidrez
7W–33L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jimmy Prince
32W–46L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Olac Fuentes
39W–24L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Osvaldo Orozco
39W–51L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trevor Rivera
39W–47L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Will Silverstein
48W–27L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yevgenko Makarov
66W–60L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.