Teams

Hammock Bay - Crane

2023 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Cathy Miles
published 3.5
3.29
Deb Dorsey
published 3.5
3.24
Lori Ceryak
published
3.21
Pattie Yergler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Jan Jackman
published
2.60
Laura Hansmann
published
Jacquie Currie
published
Lori Fisher
published
Paula Crane
published
Susan Gruber
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cathy Miles
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Deb Dorsey
35W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Lori Ceryak
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Pattie Yergler
220W–127L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Jan Jackman
12W–34L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Laura Hansmann
13W–26L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.60
Jacquie Currie
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Fisher
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula Crane
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Gruber
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.