Teams

KMcWhorter-HVCC

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-01vs SLawrence-TOCHSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAna Goodwin vs Christina Pipkin6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAnne Confer vs Penny Kraft6-1
2026-06-24vs ACharleston-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesAna Goodwin vs Marta Robertson6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Wilton Burns6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesLora Alkhawam vs Jessica Nagy6-1, 6-0
2026-06-17vs EMillard-DURWon 21
L#1 SinglesAna Goodwin vs Anna Papadopoulos4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Corinne Haywood5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAnne Confer vs Elyssa Millard6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-10vs LBible-DURLost 12
W#1 SinglesAna Goodwin vs Keshia Green6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Nsimba Mahungu4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesHadley Nixon vs Courtney Mills0-6, 1-6
2026-06-03vs LKulp-SVCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAna Goodwin vs Eve Hammett4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesHadley Nixon vs Lauren Kulp4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-27vs MLong-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesLora Alkhawam vs Clare Stull6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Polly Creveling6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAnne Confer vs Sonya Bentovich6-4, 6-2
2026-05-13vs KCaravella-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Dallas Knight1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesHadley Nixon vs Jordan Wilkins1-6, 4-6
2026-05-06vs LHeymann-UNCWon 20
W#1 SinglesAna Goodwin vs Julia Haslett6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Anne Heymann6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Kim McWhorter
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.48
Lora Alkhawam
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Ana Goodwin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.43
Anne Confer
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Hadley Nixon
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim McWhorter + Ana Goodwin6072% games+18.9% vs expected
Kim McWhorter + Anne Confer5356% games+7.4% vs expected
Kim McWhorter + Lora Alkhawam10266% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kim McWhorter
223W–79L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Lora Alkhawam
88W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Ana Goodwin
62W–42L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Anne Confer
42W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Hadley Nixon
77W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.