Teams

SDNC LT San Dieguito TC/ Froyd

2023 Mixed Doubles Tri-Level Fall SDNC · SDNC (8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-04vs SDNC LT Santaluz Club/ AndersonLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrad Woodworth / Cheryell Woodworth vs John Crick / Anna Maria Zamorano1-6, 1-6
2023-10-21vs SDNC Champ El Camino CC/ BairdLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Nasim / Natalia Moskaleva vs Jordan Cassel / Tricia Weisman5-7, 4-6
2023-09-30vs SDNC LT Santaluz Club/ AndersonLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Froyd / Eva Froyd vs John Crick / Anna Maria Zamorano1-6, 3-6
2023-09-23vs SDNC Champ El Camino CC/ BairdLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryell Woodworth / Brad Woodworth vs Jack Davis / Tricia Weisman3-6, 2-6
2023-09-09vs SDNC LT RSFTC/ LindseyLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Froyd / Natalia Moskaleva vs Geoffrey Morris / Yvonne Kalench6-3, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC (8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Eva Froyd
published 4
3.69
Vinh Tran
published
3.62
Cheryell Woodworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Robert Froyd
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Natalia Moskaleva
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.34
Lori Kartsub
published
3.12
Phil Ryan
published
3.11
Debby Latterich
published 3.5
3.06
Jonathan Roth
published
3.00
Carolyn Bennett
published 3.5
2.81
Jeff Pitzer
published
Michael Nasim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Froyd + Natalia Moskaleva4945% games+4.7% vs expected
Robert Froyd + Eva Froyd21140% games−5.0% vs expected
Michael Nasim + Natalia Moskaleva0634% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eva Froyd
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Vinh Tran
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Cheryell Woodworth
38W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Robert Froyd
77W–154L career · 4 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
4
Natalia Moskaleva
45W–122L career · 4 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
Lori Kartsub
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
Phil Ryan
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Debby Latterich
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jonathan Roth
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Carolyn Bennett
0W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Jeff Pitzer
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.81
Michael Nasim
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.