Teams

GAC NAVY

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-27vs PCC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesAudrey Davine / Chelsea Ye vs Midi Daddis / Hanni Deters1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKirsten Handler / Stacie Hochstadt vs Vicky Mediate / Shawna Walker6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Deline / Kerry Warburton vs Colleen Carlson / Macey Daddis6-4, 6-2
2025-05-20vs LTFC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesClaire Douthit / Rachel Rodgers vs Lindsi Darnell / Courtney Fabrizio7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-13vs SS-H REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesKatie Deline / Julie Wilson vs Jacquelyn Deyoung-Boyle / Jenny Phelps3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAudrey Davine / Chelsea Ye vs Amber McGregor / Mandy Paul6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2025-04-29vs RRTC REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesJuliet Beckman / Rachel Rodgers vs Michele Cunningham / Dusty Fitzgerald2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKirsten Handler / Sandra Cranston vs Tracy Hudson / Gloria Gonzalez7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-22vs PCC GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesChelsea Ye / Katie Deline vs Kristine Barrett / Vicky Mediate6-3, 6-2
2025-04-15vs LTFC BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesKatie Deline / Julie Wilson vs Sonja Russell / Tracy Brunschwig6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesChelsea Ye vs Kristin Kuruvila7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClaire Douthit / Kirsten Handler vs Ki Kellen / Colleen Frank1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJuliet Beckman vs Hiko Fritz-Krockow0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Rachel Rodgers
published
4.44
Maeve Kearney
published 4.5
4.40
Leslie Mease
published
4.33
Jaclyn Burnside
published 4.5
Audrey Davine
published 4.5
4.22
Sandra Cranston
published
4.19
Katie Deline
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.10
Kirsten Handler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Maribeth Hanzlik
published
4.05
Chelsea Ye
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.03
Julie Wilson
published
3.96
Claire Douthit
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Juliet Beckman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.75
Anna Reed
published 4.5
Kerry Warburton
published
Stacie Hochstadt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juliet Beckman + Anna Reed1442% games+9.4% vs expected
Juliet Beckman + Claire Douthit10555% games+7.2% vs expected
Kerry Warburton + Julie Wilson8950% games+3.5% vs expected
Katie Deline + Chelsea Ye8857% games+2.4% vs expected
Katie Deline + Julie Wilson181450% games+0.9% vs expected
Juliet Beckman + Chelsea Ye3649% games−2.4% vs expected
Chelsea Ye + Claire Douthit1741% games−11.8% vs expected
Juliet Beckman + Katie Deline1438% games−20.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Rodgers
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.51
4.5
Maeve Kearney
35W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
4.44
Leslie Mease
23W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Jaclyn Burnside
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Audrey Davine
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Cranston
34W–27L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Katie Deline
72W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Kirsten Handler
48W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.10
Maribeth Hanzlik
30W–31L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
4.5
Chelsea Ye
92W–114L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Julie Wilson
42W–42L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Claire Douthit
126W–103L career · 2 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.96
4.5
Juliet Beckman
57W–94L career · 2 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.94
4.5
Anna Reed
24W–37L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.75
Kerry Warburton
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacie Hochstadt
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.