Teams

Team Hawkins/Hall

2026 NMI Adult 40&O · 2026 NMI Adult 40&O 3.0W

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-01-11vs Team GalanteWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Westrick / Dana Hall vs Jane E Schneider / Michelle Rushing6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRachel Chapko / Kristin Bunte vs Kelly Dumas / Rhonda Howard2-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesLinda Woodward / Susan Dieters vs Julie Collie / Lisa LaGrou6-3, 7-6
2026-01-11vs Team GalanteLost 23
W#1 DoublesKimberly Westrick / Dana Hall vs Rhonda Howard / Kelly Dumas0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnjuli Hawkins vs Julie Carson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Chapko / Sheila Simpson vs Michelle Rushing / Jane E Schneider2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Hutchinson / Susan Dieters vs Cheryl Eberhart / Julie Collie4-6, 5-7
W#4 DoublesLinda Woodward / Kristin Bunte vs Elizabeth Simmons / Julie Galante4-2
2026-01-10vs Team GalanteSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCelia Schropp / Anjuli Hawkins vs Elizabeth Simmons / Cheryl Eberhart6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesDana Hall vs Lisa LaGrou6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKimberly Westrick / Sheila Simpson vs Jane E Schneider / Michelle Rushing1-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesLinda Woodward / Susan Dieters vs Kelly Dumas / Rhonda Howard3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 NMI Adult 40&O 3.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Hawkins/Hall218716138
2Team Galante127816128

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Dana Hall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Anjuli Hawkins
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Celia Schropp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Kimberly Westrick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Susan Dieters
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kristin Bunte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Rachel Chapko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Hall + Kimberly Westrick303 matchesnot enough data
Anjuli Hawkins + Celia Schropp213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dana Hall
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Anjuli Hawkins
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Celia Schropp
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
Kimberly Westrick
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Susan Dieters
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.58
Kristin Bunte
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Chapko
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.