Teams

Bon Air Miller

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-22vs CCV ReifsniderLost 01
L#3 DoublesKristen Powers / Pamela Blackburn vs Jan Hatcher / Catherine Benevento1-6, 4-6
2022-07-20vs Westwood Combs-PokrywkaLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Kidd / Kristen Powers vs Cathy Barksdale / Elizabeth Keith6-7, 2-6
2022-07-15vs Hermitage BetzLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Kidd / Kristen Powers vs Monica Walsh / Kirsten Knull3-6, 3-6
2022-07-13vs SCC TotaroLost 01
L#1 SinglesKristen Powers vs Jessica Steinour6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-07-08vs TDC LongLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanet Miller / Michelle Jepson vs Susan Long / Sheri Carlyle6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobin Balsamo / Kristen Powers vs Meigan Sullivan / Eliza Causey4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-06vs Westwood WatkinsWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristen Powers / Linda Kidd vs Kathryn Gray / Mary Lloyd Parks7-5, 7-5
2022-07-01vs Burkwood JohnsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobin Balsamo / Michelle Jepson vs Francine Durbin / Susan Pennino6-1, 6-2
2022-06-29vs Three Chopt DeValkLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Kidd / Michelle Jepson vs Karen Devalk / Donna Hall1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Rebecca Morgan
published
3.28
Michelle Jepson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Rebecca Cassilly
published
3.17
Rebecca Madison
published
3.15
Nancy Metz
published
3.03
Kristen Powers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Robin Balsamo
published
2.93
Jeanne Albright
published
2.79
Kimberly Rabb
published
2.78
Susan Winckler
published
2.77
Pamela Blackburn
published
2.75
Debra Flight
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Albright + Nancy Metz2740% games−1.2% vs expected
Susan Winckler + Pamela Blackburn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Morgan
15W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Michelle Jepson
130W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Rebecca Cassilly
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Rebecca Madison
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Nancy Metz
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Kristen Powers
190W–194L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
Robin Balsamo
13W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
2.96
Jeanne Albright
11W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kimberly Rabb
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.79
Susan Winckler
10W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
Pamela Blackburn
28W–34L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Debra Flight
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.