Teams

Yadkin/Binkley/18+2.5

2026 Yadkin Valley Singles 18 & Over · Women 2.5 - Tuesday Evening

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-21vs Coordinator TeamSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMiranda Diakos vs Patricia AL Phillips6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesMaria Alejandra Forero Martinez vs Angela Coburn2-6, 3-6
2026-07-14vs Coordinator TeamSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMiranda Diakos vs Maria Acuin1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMaria Alejandra Forero Martinez vs Andrea Sierra6-1, 6-0
2026-07-07vs Coordinator TeamWon 21
W#1 SinglesBrittany Nicosia vs Rose Gillespie6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMaria Alejandra Forero Martinez vs Andrea Sierra6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJoann Binkley vs Karen Craven6-7, 1-5
2026-06-30vs Coordinator TeamLost 03
L#1 SinglesMiranda Diakos vs Maria Acuin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRebecca Smitherman vs Janice Tsoules1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJoann Binkley vs Karen Craven5-7, 2-4
2026-06-23vs Coordinator TeamSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMaria Alejandra Forero Martinez vs Janice Tsoules5-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesBrittany Nicosia vs Andrea Sierra6-3, 6-0
2026-06-16vs Coordinator TeamWon 21
W#1 SinglesMiranda Diakos vs Rose Gillespie7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesRebecca Smitherman vs Maria Acuin2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMaria Alejandra Forero Martinez vs Patricia AL Phillips6-3, 6-1
2026-06-09vs Coordinator TeamLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrittany Nicosia vs Janice Tsoules4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJoann Binkley vs Karen Craven7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-02vs Coordinator TeamLost 12
L#1 SinglesRebecca Smitherman vs Maria Acuin2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMiranda Diakos vs Angela Coburn6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJoann Binkley vs Rose Gillespie0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 2.5 - Tuesday Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yadkin/Binkley/18+2.553121225203
2Coordinator Team35121226209

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.04 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.30
Maria Alejandra Forero Martinez
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 30% · published
2.10
Miranda Diakos
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.09
Brittany Nicosia
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
1.95
Rebecca Smitherman
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.74
Joann Binkley
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Alejandra Forero Martinez
7W–11L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Miranda Diakos
5W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Brittany Nicosia
5W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Rebecca Smitherman
4W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Joann Binkley
0W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.