Teams

Alschlager

2024 Adult 55 & Over Winter · 7.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-02-29vs Ledray-No FaultsWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Wiggins / William Kolstad vs Patrick Ledray / Thanh Pham6-2, 6-1
2024-02-22vs Carnahan Northern LightsWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Kolstad / David Wiggins vs ERIK LARSON / Eric Dieperink6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-08vs Ledray-No FaultsWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Kolstad / David Wiggins vs Craig Kuberski / Tim Theobald6-1, 6-2
2024-02-01vs Carnahan Northern LightsWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Wiggins / William Kolstad vs Eric Dieperink / Paul Bennett6-4, 7-6
2024-01-25vs Hassenstab - Fed ExpressWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Kolstad / David Wiggins vs Steve Palmer / Scott Weiland6-1, 6-3
2024-01-18vs Ledray-No FaultsWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Wiggins / William Kolstad vs Mike Hicks / Leigh Carlson6-2, 7-6
2024-01-11vs Carnahan Northern LightsWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Wiggins / William Kolstad vs ERIK LARSON / Eric Dieperink2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Jeff Fontaine
published
3.46
Tom Larson
published
3.39
David Wiggins
published 3.5
3.39
William Kolstad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Charles Bobertz
published 3.5
3.32
Bob Christiansen
published 3.5
3.30
DAT HO
published 3.5
3.27
Jim Schwier
published
3.23
Keith Abrahamson
published
3.15
Mark Alschlager
published
John Jerlow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Alschlager + DAT HO3249% games−1.2% vs expected
Bob Christiansen + Jim Schwier134 matchesnot enough data
DAT HO + Keith Abrahamson224 matchesnot enough data
William Kolstad + Mark Alschlager123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Fontaine
41W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.90
Tom Larson
25W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
David Wiggins
14W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
William Kolstad
130W–83L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Charles Bobertz
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Bob Christiansen
40W–38L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
DAT HO
21W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Jim Schwier
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Keith Abrahamson
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.23
Mark Alschlager
16W–23L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
John Jerlow
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.