Teams

WCCP-Schnurman

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 2.67 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-02-26vs EW-PC-HedbonLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Schnurman / Sarah Donahue vs Mauri Morgan / Shaelah Harmon0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAlissa Long vs Jaelynne King1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesARLENE CUSTER / Debi Herbst vs Tina Duncan / Susan Duncan1-6, 3-6
2023-02-26vs EW-YTC-LybeckWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Schnurman / ARLENE CUSTER vs Bri Plath / Amy Karau6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKathi Plager vs Molly Neal1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebi Herbst / Alissa Long vs Lesley Brown / Jennifer Terami0-6, 0-6
2023-02-25vs EW-YTC-LybeckLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlissa Long / Sarah Donahue vs Amy Karau / Lesley Brown4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Schnurman / Debi Herbst vs Bri Plath / Molly Neal0-6, 0-6
2023-02-25vs EW-PC-HedbonLost 03
L#1 DoublesARLENE CUSTER / Alissa Long vs Mauri Morgan / Rikki West4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDebi Herbst vs Tiffany Hebdon0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Schnurman / Kathi Plager vs Shaelah Harmon / Susan Duncan3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-Hedbon40102460
2EW-YTC-Lybeck13661382
3WCCP-Schnurman1321021138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alison Walton
published 3
2.65
ARLENE CUSTER
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Alissa Long
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Brita Frost
published 2.5
2.09
Anne Schnurman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.97
Debi Herbst
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Kathi Plager
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Sarah Donahue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debi Herbst + Anne Schnurman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alison Walton
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
ARLENE CUSTER
21W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
2.65
2.5
Alissa Long
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Brita Frost
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Anne Schnurman
5W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Debi Herbst
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Kathi Plager
2W–16L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Donahue
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.