Teams

WOMEN

Combo 18 & Over · Extra Players

4 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-09-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRachel Frick / Carla Young vs Kathy Ferguson / Elizabeth Regan0-6, 0-6
2024-09-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTracy Corson / Kelly Eifert vs Gina Wilkie / Heather Pate1-6, 3-6
2024-09-04Lost 02
L#2 DoublesKelly Eifert / Janice Allen vs Kimberly Adams / Virginie Daguise4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Frick / Lydia Thurston vs Stephanie Schaller / Serena Concepcion0-6, 0-6
2024-08-28Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTracy Corson / Rachel Frick vs Mary Wright / Sara Rogers2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Eifert / Janice Allen vs Emma Jenkins / Marie Aimone3-6, 3-6
2024-08-27Lost 03
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Walter / Rachel Frick vs Sarah Manning / Marley Smith0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Eaker / Kelly Eifert vs Elizabeth Olsgaard / Thea Wolfe0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTracy Corson / Renee Connolly vs Erin Groves / Katherine Way0-6, 0-6
2024-08-21Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRenee Connolly / Elisabeth Walter vs Kennah Brearley / Leigh Cason3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Frick / Lydia Thurston vs Kelly Bunch / Charity Ard0-6, 0-6
2024-08-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesTracy Corson / Renee Connolly vs Gail Jabber / Bianca Byrd7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2024-08-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Corson / Renee Connolly vs Jessica Li / Kayla Antosz6-1, 6-2
2024-07-31Split 11
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Walter / Kelly Eifert vs Emilie Brown / Kayley Robey6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRachel Frick / Carla Young vs Jenny Pittman / Elizabeth Erdle6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-10vs CTL18/Auld/CTFCLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarla Young / Renee Connolly vs Lyssa Fisher / Liz Auld1-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Extra Players have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.07 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.37
Renee Connolly
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.20
Kelly Eifert
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
1.65
Rachel Frick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Gilbreth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Connolly + Kelly Eifert4651% games+4.7% vs expected
Kelly Eifert + Rachel Frick2441% gamesnot enough data
Renee Connolly + Rachel Frick1430% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Renee Connolly
43W–50L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%85%15%
2.37
Kelly Eifert
23W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.20
Rachel Frick
6W–39L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.65
Melissa Gilbreth
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.