Teams

LA - Ladybugs

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Women 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-01vs LA - MulhollandWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelinda Martinez / Armani Martin vs LeAnn Aharonian / Chi Kephart6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAlyssa Binczyk vs Julie Tran6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKatelyn Guza / Ievgeniia Ostrovska vs Hillary Lowe / Cassandra Jean Amell6-3, 6-2
2025-05-04vs LA - Balls DeepLost 03
L#1 DoublesLOLA HERRON / Jenny Ip vs Nicki Jaeger / Raquelle de la Rocha2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMelinda Martinez vs Portia Furst1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesIevgeniia Ostrovska / Alyssa Binczyk vs Melissa Karz / Eunice Lakis3-6, 6-7
2025-04-19vs LA - Dare DoublesLost 01
L#1 SinglesAlyssa Binczyk vs Elena Howell3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Alyssa Binczyk
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Armani Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Alexsis Glenn
published 3
2.15
Ievgeniia Ostrovska
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
LOLA HERRON
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Katelyn Guza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Melinda Martinez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.99
Natalie Uribe
published
1.98
Kimara Davis
published
Jenny Ip
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Metta Girma
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ievgeniia Ostrovska + Katelyn Guza5348% games+0.1% vs expected
Kimara Davis + LOLA HERRON0830% gamesnot enough data
Natalie Uribe + Katelyn Guza123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alyssa Binczyk
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Armani Martin
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Alexsis Glenn
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
Ievgeniia Ostrovska
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
LOLA HERRON
10W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Katelyn Guza
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Melinda Martinez
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Natalie Uribe
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Kimara Davis
3W–20L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Jenny Ip
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Metta Girma
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.