Teams

10isNE1

2021 One Doubles · 3.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-10vs BC-Breakers 2021Won 10
W#1 DoublesAaron Haffner / Lakhmeet Singh Ghai vs Chris Barry / Clifford Flekser6-4, 6-3
2021-07-29vs CacWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Loiselle / Vaclav Petricek vs Edward Hocker / Matthew Bohan7-6, 6-2
2021-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Casey / Lakhmeet Singh Ghai vs Derek Baxter / Marc Malone6-2, 6-2
2021-07-19vs BelRed BlastersWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Casey / Lakhmeet Singh Ghai vs Chandra Srinivasan / Lakshmi Kumar Tiruppukuzhi6-1, 6-3
2021-07-12vs RaghavanWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Loiselle / Lakhmeet Singh Ghai vs Sundar Raghavan / Skanda Iyer7-6, 6-4
2021-07-05vs LindensWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Loiselle / Lakhmeet Singh Ghai vs Nathan Linden / Merlyn Linden6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
110isNE16060036
2Vij6060242
3J&B6060348
4BC-Breakers 20215151229
5Back pain, Achilles and Frozen shoulder5151331
6SSDG5151450
7Team Gipson/Krimmel4242760
8Cac3232438
9Shock and Awe3333650
10MICC-Hounsell/Thomas3333751
11Double Up3333752
12RM Tennis3333857
13Lindens2323753
14Wanat/Bailey2424957
15No Chans24241063
16BelRed Blasters1414851
17Rusty Federers1414960
18MICC-Peck15151066
19SliceSliceBaby05051059
20Team Medzegian06061272
21Malone06061272
22AlwaysBeClosing06061270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christopher Loiselle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Vaclav Petricek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Aaron Haffner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Adam Casey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Lakhmeet Singh Ghai
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Loiselle + Vaclav Petricek17559% games+10.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Loiselle
59W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Vaclav Petricek
39W–14L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
4
Aaron Haffner
122W–97L career · 1 line in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Adam Casey
33W–41L career · 2 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
Lakhmeet Singh Ghai
134W–72L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.