Teams

Marinites Unite/Herzog/Mill Valley

2024 Tri-Level 3.0 · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-12vs Mixie Chics/Acosta/Walnut CreekWon 30
W#1 DoublesNicole Bianchi / Elizabeth Shalev vs Heidi Belton / Darcy Beauchemin6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnya Bosina / Lucia Wallace vs Christine Meng / Kristina Karr6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Blevins / Jennifer Lefferts vs Maria Rueda / Bek Chee3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-10-11vs Net Ninjas/Vincent/San CarlosWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Bianchi / Elizabeth Shalev vs Allison Don / Victoria Leong-Ping6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTori Herzog / Melinda Whitmore vs Cynthia Wang / Tiffany Truong6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKarolina Gachowska / Christine Yeh vs Esther Kim / Hannah Kim6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-11vs Volley Girls/Garcia/PleasantonWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Sullivan / Tina Skouras vs Susan Aneja / Mi Qi6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTori Herzog / Melinda Whitmore vs Jill Fissel / Jazy Zhang6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Yeh / Karolina Gachowska vs Divya Bala / Audrey Schroeder6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Elizabeth Shalev
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Nicole Bianchi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Anne Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Tina Skouras
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Lucia Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Tori Herzog
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Karolina Gachowska
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Melinda Whitmore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Tania Lowenthal
published
Anya Bosina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Jennifer Lefferts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Sarah Blevins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melinda Whitmore + Karolina Gachowska4164% games+9.4% vs expected
Melinda Whitmore + Tori Herzog9553% games+1.6% vs expected
Tina Skouras + Anne Sullivan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Shalev
13W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
Nicole Bianchi
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
3.92
4
Anne Sullivan
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Tina Skouras
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.56
Lucia Wallace
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Tori Herzog
29W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Karolina Gachowska
25W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Melinda Whitmore
17W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Tania Lowenthal
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Anya Bosina
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Lefferts
18W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.10
Sarah Blevins
18W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.