Teams

WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Lifesport Rutchik

2022 WI Adult 55 & Over · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women (Eve)

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesJoyce Koker / Mary Rutchik vs Lina Cicero / Glenna Haas6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Rupnow / Lisa Ree-Nightingale vs Eileen Paykel / Nora Pecor4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTheresa Leopold / Donna Alfano vs Kathy Hock / Lorrie Losee6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMary Rutchik / Theresa Leopold vs Andrea Bomwell / Jennifer Wilcox3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoyce Koker / Jenny Anderson vs Sue Gryniewicz / Lynn Deabler6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Rupnow / Michelle Waller vs Lisa Murn / Gloria Grundman6-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesTheresa Leopold / Joyce Koker vs Marina Melberg / Theresa Seem7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Rutchik / Jenny Anderson vs Leslie Brooks / Maryanne Riege1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJeanne Main / Mary Rutchik vs Bernett Crymes / Joan Donner6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoyce Koker / Jenny Anderson vs Deborah Blanks / Lanette Kagen6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPatrice Drummond / Donna Alfano vs Kathie Chvojicek / Susan Schoenfeld4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesTheresa Leopold / Asiyah Khan vs Valery Koch / Jeanne Augustine3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoyce Koker / Julie Rupnow vs Nancy Huttelmaier / Melanie Kuzmanovic4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Waller / Lisa Ree-Nightingale vs Pamela Cavanaugh / Sadie Podewils3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesTheresa Leopold / Joyce Koker vs Katie Knudsen / Karen Stromsted7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAsiyah Khan / Cheryl May vs Sharon Buell / Amy Diorio6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJenny Anderson / Michelle Waller vs Jenny Levin / Sandy Schumaker6-0, 7-5
W#1 DoublesJeanne Main / Cheryl May vs Karen Straw / Dagmar Vetta6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJenny Anderson / Mary Rutchik vs Julie Courtney / Robin Devilbiss2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatrice Drummond / Julie Rupnow vs Julie Reigle / Paula Bergquist6-2, 7-5
W#1 DoublesJeanne Main / Cheryl May vs Linda Koenig / Paula Shows3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoyce Koker / Theresa Leopold vs Glenna Haas / Ada Vogel6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichelle Waller / Lisa Ree-Nightingale vs Nora Pecor / Lauren Silbar3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJoyce Koker / Mary Rutchik vs Gail Sousa / Jodi Lord6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAsiyah Khan / Theresa Leopold vs Carol Cantieri / Mary Riemer6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJenny Anderson / Patrice Drummond vs Lisa Murn / Sally Devriend3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women (Eve)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML River Glen Melberg8119824224
2WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Princeton Eichten6318921230
3WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Lifesport Rutchik6318923216
4WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Mequon Elite Buell44101431238
5WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML The Legend Murn3581633238
6WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Highlander Courtney36111634242
7WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Mequon Elite Pecor36121535266
8WI Adult 55&O 7.0 W GML Elite North Shore Kagen2791840275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Joyce Koker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Asiyah Khan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Cheryl May
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Jeanne Main
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Theresa Leopold
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Donna Alfano
published
Jenny Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Rupnow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Rutchik
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Michelle Waller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patrice Drummond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Leopold + Asiyah Khan10559% games+6.6% vs expected
Mary Rutchik + Jeanne Main8262% games+2.9% vs expected
Theresa Leopold + Joyce Koker7062% games+1.4% vs expected
Theresa Leopold + Jeanne Main8557% games+1.3% vs expected
Asiyah Khan + Joyce Koker10756% games+0.6% vs expected
Theresa Leopold + Mary Rutchik8555% games−1.0% vs expected
Cheryl May + Jeanne Main12353% games−1.0% vs expected
Jenny Anderson + Julie Rupnow4258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joyce Koker
97W–46L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Asiyah Khan
63W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cheryl May
38W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeanne Main
59W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Theresa Leopold
88W–64L career · 7 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Donna Alfano
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jenny Anderson
27W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Rupnow
37W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Rutchik
35W–21L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Waller
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patrice Drummond
26W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.