Teams

Temple Terrace Bulls - S. Jenkins

2026 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-28vs HILLS/Adult55&over8.0M/ K. ChinLost 12
W#1 DoublesKen Coulter / Michael Costanza vs Felipe Guacache / Steven Friedman6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMax R Francois / Brian Westmoreland vs Jeff Conston / James Schneider4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Chen / Walter Norwood vs James Baker / Jacob Munch3-6, 1-6
2026-03-14vs Hunters Green Goop - M. WarrenWon 21
L#1 DoublesMax R Francois / Michael Costanza vs John Cotey / John Phillips4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKen Coulter / Rick Burkhart vs Sean Friday / Jim Johnson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteven Jenkins / Brian Westmoreland vs Ken Kranick / Philip Kalafut6-4, 6-4
2026-03-07vs Sun City Center - K. JohnsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Costanza / Patrick Rairigh vs Michael Nugent / Gary Taylor2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMax R Francois / Walter Norwood vs Qin Yang / Mark Nelson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBruce Wyse / Robert Chen vs KEVIN JOHNSON / Terry Payton6-7, 5-3
2026-02-21vs Hunters Green Goop - M. WarrenLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Costanza / Max R Francois vs Patrick Randrianarison / Ian Zhang7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKen Coulter / Rick Burkhart vs Ken Kranick / Chris Burdge6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPatrick Rairigh / Brian Westmoreland vs Timothy Carr / John Phillips7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-14vs Sun City Center - K. JohnsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesWalter Norwood / Patrick Rairigh vs Mark Nelson / Henry Gales6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-07vs HILLS/Adult55&over8.0M/ K. ChinWon 21
W#1 DoublesRick Burkhart / Ken Coulter vs Mony Rodon / Mike Gonzalez6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMax R Francois / Brian Westmoreland vs Jeff Conston / Jack Korta6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Rairigh / Bruce Wyse vs Felipe Guacache / Steven Friedman4-6, 4-6
2026-01-31vs Hunters Green Goop - M. WarrenLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteven Jenkins / Ken Coulter vs John Cotey / Ian Zhang2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMax R Francois / Brian Westmoreland vs Doug Angelone / Chris Burdge4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Rairigh / Bruce Wyse vs Sean Friday / Jim Johnson2-6, 2-6
2026-01-24vs Sun City Center - K. JohnsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMax R Francois / Robert Chen vs KEVIN JOHNSON / Michael Nugent3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesWalter Norwood / Rick Burkhart vs Neal Peterson / Rick Fortier5-7, 1-6
2026-01-17vs HILLS/Adult55&over8.0M/ K. ChinLost 03
L#1 DoublesBruce Wyse / Ken Coulter vs Mike Gonzalez / Mony Rodon3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSteven Jenkins / Michael Costanza vs Steven Friedman / Michael Palmer7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatrick Rairigh / Walter Norwood vs Ken Chin / Jack Korta0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Ken Coulter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Max R Francois
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.40
Bruce Wyse
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Brian Westmoreland
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Steven Jenkins
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Robert Chen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Patrick Rairigh
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.08
Rick Burkhart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Walter Norwood
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Michael Costanza
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Costanza + Patrick Rairigh12658% gamesnot enough data
Robert Chen + Michael Costanza4155% gamesnot enough data
Max R Francois + Brian Westmoreland3246% gamesnot enough data
Robert Chen + Max R Francois224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Costanza + Max R Francois314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Costanza + Steven Jenkins314 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Rairigh + Walter Norwood044 matchesnot enough data
Rick Burkhart + Ken Coulter314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Coulter
9W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Max R Francois
14W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Bruce Wyse
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Brian Westmoreland
11W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
Steven Jenkins
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Robert Chen
158W–87L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Patrick Rairigh
108W–103L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Rick Burkhart
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Walter Norwood
100W–78L career · 5 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Michael Costanza
129W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.