Teams

McDonald 4.5

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 4.5 WOMEN

15 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-18vs Estey-Alexander 18+ Early StartWon 31
W#1 DoublesSuzie Heideman / Erica Toppin vs Cristina Kazda / Sofia Terzic6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRachel LaTour vs Brooke Hapuku4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMaggie Niska / Lauren Gould vs Brittany Alexander / Jane Booth-Tobin6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesElisabeth Walker vs Mona Oenning6-0, 6-3
2024-12-17vs Reiling-Stout 4.5 ESWon 21
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Walker / Rachel LaTour vs Amy Mitchell / Lea Blackwell Favor3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPatricia Goodrich vs Megan Schmidt6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMegan Biehn vs Anna Nguyen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-20vs Reiling-Stout 4.5 ESWon 40
W#1 DoublesSam Eklund / Erica Toppin vs Anna Lyon / Lea Blackwell Favor6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDanielle Niska vs Anna Nguyen6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTaylor Jackson / Suzie Heideman vs Kathryn Bergmann / Martha Ginder6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Gould / Sara Humann vs Theresa Harich / Sara Hong6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-06vs Estey-Alexander 18+ Early StartWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmanda Nunez / Elisabeth Walker vs Marti Estey / Mona Oenning6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesPatricia Goodrich vs Brooke Hapuku4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJill Johnson / Danielle Niska vs Andrea Boado / Sofia Terzic6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Biehn / Lauren Gould vs Cecilia Grass-Neary / Molly Hemes6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.73
Danielle Niska
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.64
Maggie Niska
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.56
Suzie Heideman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.53
Amanda Nunez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.44
Michaela Schulz
published
4.39
Linnea Benson
published
4.36
Erica Toppin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Elisabeth Walker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Patricia Goodrich
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.21
Sara Humann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
Rachel LaTour
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.09
Jane Lent
published
Lauren Gould
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Megan Biehn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Sam Eklund
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisabeth Walker + Linnea Benson303 matchesnot enough data
Rachel LaTour + Jane Lent123 matchesnot enough data
Suzie Heideman + Michaela Schulz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Danielle Niska
18W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.73
Maggie Niska
23W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%15%85%
4.64
Suzie Heideman
24W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.56
5
Amanda Nunez
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.53
Michaela Schulz
22W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
4.44
Linnea Benson
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Erica Toppin
24W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Elisabeth Walker
28W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
Patricia Goodrich
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Sara Humann
23W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
4.21
Rachel LaTour
30W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
Jane Lent
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.09
Lauren Gould
4W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Biehn
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sam Eklund
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.