Teams

TCRC Parrish

2024 Richmond Combo Weekday · Richmond Combo Weekday 6.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-14vs HCC TindelWon 21
L#1 DoublesDonna Hall / Anne Hennessey vs Lauren McKetta / Debra Suyama3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatherine Mortimer / Pamela Hughes vs Andrea Wassmer / Jessica Tindel6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDonna Boykin / Beth Parrish vs Alison Chesson / Teki Hall3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-11-12vs Hermitage BlueLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Parrish / Donna Boykin vs Lisa Frazier / Anne Stewart Blaylock1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Hall / Pam Berger vs Betsy Kersey / Elizabeth Wiertel2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Mortimer / Nancy Priddy vs Joanna Bergeron / Corey Booker1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKatherine Mortimer / Pamela Hughes vs Kate Hamilton / Samantha Wetzel4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPam Berger / Donna Hall vs Rose Yuen / Katherine Singleton2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Boykin / Nancy Priddy vs Karen Viverette / Elizabeth Brogan5-7, 2-6
2024-11-05vs Wyndham LatiefLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Hall / Anne Hennessey vs Laureen Mertz / Meigan Sullivan2-6, 0-3
L#2 DoublesBeth Parrish / Pamela Hughes vs Cris Latief / Becky Harper3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Boykin / Pam Berger vs Kumiko Suzuki / Helen Wang1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekday 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Beth Parrish
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Donna Hall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Katherine Mortimer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Donna Boykin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Pam Berger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Nancy Priddy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Anne Hennessey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Hall + Pam Berger0528% gamesnot enough data
Donna Boykin + Beth Parrish134 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Priddy + Pam Berger044 matchesnot enough data
Donna Hall + Katherine Mortimer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Parrish
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Donna Hall
14W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Katherine Mortimer
7W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.93
Donna Boykin
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
2.85
Pam Berger
3W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.80
Nancy Priddy
3W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
2.76
3
Anne Hennessey
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.