Teams

JLenz (Queens)

2025 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Men - Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-28vs RVojjini (Queens)Won 10
W#2 SinglesJared Ingram vs Kevin Baker6-4, 6-4
2025-07-21vs IFuster (Queens)Won 10
W#1 SinglesJared Ingram vs Ian Fuster6-1, 6-3
2025-07-18vs BThio (Jeff Adams)Won 21
L#1 SinglesJacob Lenz vs Brian Batas7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEvan Koch vs Christopher Cappello6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAlex Giardina vs Suman Biswas6-3, 6-3
2025-06-30vs RHarper (Mason Wallace)Won 30
W#1 SinglesChris Valli vs Nick Newton6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesEvan Koch vs Michael Price6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJeff Barrows vs Max Brauer6-3, 6-2
2025-06-28vs IFuster (Queens)Won 10
W#2 SinglesMikiya Kozakai vs Ian Fuster6-4, 6-0
2025-06-23vs RVojjini (Queens)Won 10
W#1 SinglesMikiya Kozakai vs Warren Stanton6-4, 7-6
2025-06-09vs BThio (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 SinglesMikiya Kozakai vs Brandon Thio6-4, 6-1
2025-06-02vs MJarzynski (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 SinglesMikiya Kozakai vs Will Gardner6-0, 6-2
2025-05-19vs RHarper (Mason Wallace)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMikiya Kozakai vs Miguel Monguilod6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Jared Ingram
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.86
Mikiya Kozakai
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.86
Chris Valli
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.84
Jacob Lenz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.81
Alex Giardina
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Evan Koch
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.66
Jeff Barrows
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacob Lenz + Alex Giardina4258% games+0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jared Ingram
102W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
4
Mikiya Kozakai
32W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Chris Valli
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Jacob Lenz
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Alex Giardina
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Evan Koch
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Jeff Barrows
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.