Teams

B3 Raintree Raghavan Renegades

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-08vs B8 Burkwood McKelveyLost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew Earle / Edward Yesbeck vs Sam McKelvey / Bret McFee3-6, 3-6
2023-06-01vs B6 Westwood GilmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Earle / Edward Yesbeck vs Robert Paullin / Carter Berry6-3, 6-3
2023-05-25vs B4 ACAC HollomonWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatthew Earle / Edward Yesbeck vs William Crowe / Craig Carman6-3, 7-5
2023-04-20vs B1 Hermitage FisherWon 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Earle / Edward Yesbeck vs Douglas Gray / Ted Luse6-3, 6-3
2023-04-13vs B10 CCV WherryWon 10
W#2 DoublesEdward Yesbeck / Ram Raghavan vs Tommy Thompson / Al Strickler III6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Lee Brooks
published
3.80
Ram Raghavan
published
3.79
Mahesh Sukumaran
published
3.79
Cory Connell
published 4
3.78
Geoff Campbell
published
3.71
Matthew Sheehan
published
3.67
Matthew Earle
published
3.66
Carey Donovan
published 4
3.64
Edward Yesbeck
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.47
Madhav Kidambi
published
3.36
Theo Prestia
published
3.30
Stuart Dowdy
published
Gary Wills
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Brooks + Geoff Campbell6258% games−2.0% vs expected
Ram Raghavan + Mahesh Sukumaran303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lee Brooks
28W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
Ram Raghavan
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
Mahesh Sukumaran
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Cory Connell
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
Geoff Campbell
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Matthew Sheehan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
Matthew Earle
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Carey Donovan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Edward Yesbeck
127W–115L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
Madhav Kidambi
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
Theo Prestia
20W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
Stuart Dowdy
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Gary Wills
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.