Teams

WNCD Walker (HRC)

Combo 40 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 40's Men 6.5 Combo - Mon

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-08vs WNCJ Carrington (ARC-South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKarl Kemper / Grant Griffin vs Dave Kroondyk / Dennis Mason1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesFrancis Mabunga / Joseph Rogers vs Hilawe Semunegus / Leon Tu3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHeath Cope / Peter Cook vs Breen OBrien / Josh Wright2-6, 0-6
2025-09-29vs WNCJ Carrington (ARC-South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Walker / Joseph Rogers vs Brian Frellick / Stephen Gay1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Hobbs / Heath Cope vs Philip Burleson / Stanley Treece3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPeter Cook / Francis Mabunga vs Breen OBrien / Joe Carrington0-6, 3-6
2025-09-08vs WNCJ Carrington (ARC-South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Walker / Grant Griffin vs Dave Kroondyk / Doug West6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Hobbs / Heath Cope vs Tom McDonnell / Stephen Gay5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Rogers / Francis Mabunga vs Breen OBrien / Leon Tu3-6, 0-6
2025-08-18vs WNCJ Carrington (ARC-South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Walker / Heath Cope vs Brian Frellick / Doug West6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKarl Kemper / Grant Griffin vs Tom McDonnell / Philip Burleson2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Hobbs / Francis Mabunga vs Breen OBrien / Leon Tu3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40's Men 6.5 Combo - Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Karl Kemper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Daniel Walker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Grant Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.04
Heath Cope
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Joseph Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
John Hobbs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Francis Mabunga
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Scott Jumper
published
2.63
Peter Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matt Ballance
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karl Kemper
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Daniel Walker
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.12
3
Grant Griffin
14W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Heath Cope
29W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Joseph Rogers
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.89
John Hobbs
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Francis Mabunga
12W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Scott Jumper
5W–16L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Peter Cook
13W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.63
Matt Ballance
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.