← Teams

TCSP-Schneider

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Adam Sherr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Kenneth Troop
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Results6 ties
2024-03-09Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesEthan Chung / Adam Sherr vs Oliver Graves / Sean Du3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKenneth Troop / Sean Fitzgerald vs Michael Hull / Michael Ensing6-2, 6-0
2024-03-01Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesKenneth Troop / Glynn Omoto vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-17Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesAdam Sherr / Ryan Hardie vs Kirk Ketefian / Michael Nolan6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2024-01-27Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesKenneth Troop / Jeffrey Hanschmann vs Allan Yeung / Ravi Subramanian6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-01-21Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesEthan Chung / Adam Sherr vs Ciprian Clinciu / Adrian Fanaru6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDean Ciano / Kenneth Troop vs Adrian Dragusanu / Clement Ifrim6-1, 6-4
2024-01-14Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesEthan Chung / Kenneth Troop vs Juan Vegarra / David Park6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Adam Sherr
107W–94L career
0%99%0%
3.28
3.5
Kenneth Troop
97W–61L career
19%81%0%
3.06

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.