Teams

SD 9.0 University City RC/ Lock

2022 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter - SD · SD - 9.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-19vs SD 9.0 Pacific Beach TC/ ParkLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Podney / Stuart Ridge vs Caroline Bhupathi / Lucas Heilman5-7, 4-6
2022-03-05vs SD 9.0 LJTC/ NguyenWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Baker / Stuart Ridge vs Anastacia Blazevich / Anandha Subramanian6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRichette Lock / Donald McLeod vs Raymond Herr / Sundi Olson6-4, 6-4
2022-02-26vs SD 9.0 Coronado HS- ET/ NavarroWon 20
W#2 DoublesJoseph Barbarie / Richette Lock vs Voltaire Navarro / Joan Yngson6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStuart Ridge / Janet Podney vs Everette Labrador / Arielle Valera7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-12vs SD LLW 9.0 Peninsula TC/ GallegoLost 01
L#2 DoublesJed Galan / Sanem Ahearn vs Jeff Ray / Deborah Lee-Tep2-6, 3-6
2022-02-05vs SD 9.0 Mtn View/ ChungLost 01
L#3 DoublesJed Galan / Sanem Ahearn vs Bruna Tasso / Antonio Hernandez7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-01-22vs SD 9.0 Coronado HS- ET/ NavarroLost 01
L#3 DoublesRichette Lock / Adam Espiritu vs Dale Gutierrez / Guadalupe Rendon3-6, 1-6
2022-01-08vs SD 9.0 Mtn View/ ChungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRichette Lock / Joseph Barbarie vs Sherr Aquino / Lucio Cangiano7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSanem Ahearn / Jed Galan vs Shelley Goodson / Will Garber6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Sanem Ahearn
published
4.32
Donald McLeod
published 4.5
4.30
Jenny Sharratt
published 4.5
4.29
Stuart Ridge
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Andrew MacFarlane
published 4.5
4.23
Katherine Steinberg
published
4.09
Richette Lock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.09
Janet Podney
published
3.87
Jed Galan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Jeffrey Ford
published
Jesse Steinberg
published
Joseph Barbarie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Podney + Jeffrey Ford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sanem Ahearn
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
4.93
4.5
Donald McLeod
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
4.32
4.5
Jenny Sharratt
93W–60L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Stuart Ridge
108W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Andrew MacFarlane
13W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.24
Katherine Steinberg
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Richette Lock
96W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.09
Janet Podney
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Jed Galan
161W–84L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
Jeffrey Ford
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jesse Steinberg
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Barbarie
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.