Teams

Reyes (Ron Ehmann)

2024 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 3.5 Adult Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Silvia Quiroga
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.46
Patricia Pico
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
3.36
Wendy Coles
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.34
Tiffany Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.29
Patricia GrandaAramburu
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published
3.25
Ana Arazoza
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Lorena Alonso
published
3.21
Adriana Faillace
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Ana Veloso
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Berenice Elguezabal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Kelly Mc Cormick
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.10
Tricia Kleinberg
published
2.92
Rosemarie Reyes
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.65
Cynthia Slaman
published 3
SERAP CARDAK
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Garcia + Patricia Pico291757% games+5.9% vs expected
Patricia GrandaAramburu + Berenice Elguezabal81153% games+4.2% vs expected
Ana Arazoza + Patricia Pico16856% games+3.4% vs expected
Kelly Mc Cormick + Ana Arazoza91254% games−0.1% vs expected
Rosemarie Reyes + Kelly Mc Cormick263346% games−3.2% vs expected
Kelly Mc Cormick + Patricia GrandaAramburu51349% games−5.1% vs expected
Ana Arazoza + Tiffany Garcia6551% games−7.8% vs expected
Kelly Mc Cormick + Tiffany Garcia6652% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Silvia Quiroga
71W–85L career · 10 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Patricia Pico
74W–53L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
Wendy Coles
72W–99L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
Tiffany Garcia
70W–46L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Patricia GrandaAramburu
91W–81L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Ana Arazoza
102W–75L career · 9 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Lorena Alonso
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Adriana Faillace
82W–81L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Ana Veloso
54W–94L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Berenice Elguezabal
45W–85L career · 6 lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
3.12
Kelly Mc Cormick
97W–105L career · 7 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Tricia Kleinberg
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Rosemarie Reyes
74W–107L career · 6 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Cynthia Slaman
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.65
SERAP CARDAK
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.