Teams

Albright 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PM

2024 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 40 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-02vs Brown 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaryn Efird / Virginia Easley vs Tara Burgio / Vangie Cruz4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAprille Black / Emily Wilson vs Yvonne Singh / Cindy McElreath3-6, 3-6
2024-09-18vs Brown 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaryn Efird / Virginia Easley vs Tara Burgio / Jacqueline Herron3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBritt Flanagan / Emily Wilson vs Robyn Manning / Minerva Loran4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKaryn Efird / Virginia Easley vs Cheryl Bock / Suzanne Johnson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Joplin / Emily Wilson vs Margaret Holshouser / Pamela Hughes6-3, 6-4
2024-08-14vs Goodman/Scott 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PMSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSarah Joplin / Emily Wilson vs Melissa Goodman / Kimberly Franz5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAprille Black / Karyn Efird vs Joy Martin / Andrea Pollina1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesKaryn Efird / Virginia Easley vs Libby Strickland / Jean Eagan6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Sarah Joplin
published
3.77
Virginia Easley
published
3.71
Carole Albright
published 4
3.69
Julie Dover
published
3.59
Karyn Efird
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.51
Virginia Christman
published
3.50
Kimberly Halsey
published
3.34
Lauran Epstein
published
3.30
Britt Flanagan
published 3.5
3.17
Aprille Black
published 3.5
3.04
Emily Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Courtney Dagger
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carole Albright + Virginia Christman224 matchesnot enough data
Karyn Efird + Emily Wilson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Joplin
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Virginia Easley
24W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Carole Albright
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Julie Dover
40W–22L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Karyn Efird
256W–113L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.59
Virginia Christman
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
Kimberly Halsey
57W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Lauran Epstein
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Aprille Black
11W–19L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Emily Wilson
178W–123L career · 4 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Courtney Dagger
37W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.