Teams

LDWI-Winton/LNRC

2024 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Men 9.0 Thurs PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-02vs LMFE-Ferrero/PACLost 01
L#3 DoublesCharles Quinn / Brett Scherrman vs Brad Rush / Bryant Knauer4-6, 5-7
2024-04-25vs LMFE-Ferrero/PACLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Winton / Steve Brinkman vs Samuel Kopchick / Jeb Courtney6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-18vs LMFE-Ferrero/PACLost 02
L#2 DoublesCharles Quinn / Alan Deddens vs Yeshpal Lakkadi / Brad Rush3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Winton / Steve Brinkman vs Keith Kye / Bryant Knauer6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrett Scherrman / Otto Vejsada vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-28vs LMFE-Ferrero/PACSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrett Scherrman / Otto Vejsada vs Samuel Kopchick / Jack Horowitz6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCharles Quinn / Steve Brinkman vs Todd Sommers / Keith Kye2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-03-21vs LMFE-Ferrero/PACLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Foland / Charles Quinn vs Robert Fryer / Todd Sommers0-6, 4-6
2024-03-14vs LMFE-Ferrero/PACWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Brinkman / Daniel Winton vs Yeshpal Lakkadi / Robert Fryer0-3, 0-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 9.0 Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Otto Vejsada
published
4.01
Steve Brinkman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.97
Daniel Winton
published 4
3.92
Charles Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.89
Kent Temple
published
3.71
Brett Scherrman
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.60
Alan Deddens
published 4
3.52
Edward Bugg
published
Scott Plemmons
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Brinkman + Charles Quinn2941% gamesnot enough data
Brett Scherrman + Charles Quinn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Otto Vejsada
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.47
4.5
Steve Brinkman
67W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Daniel Winton
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
4.5
Charles Quinn
70W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.92
Kent Temple
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.89
4
Brett Scherrman
116W–113L career · 11 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Alan Deddens
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Edward Bugg
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.52
Scott Plemmons
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.