Teams

BP-Terrell/Herringer

2024 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Women) - Spring · Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-23vs SQ-BelliWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Ward / Nancy Cavallo vs Debbie Neville / Amy Kellett6-0, 6-1
2024-03-13vs BP-BehrWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Ward / Meaghan Ryan vs Amy Behr / Ruth Devey6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-03-05vs SATA/Kelly McKeeLost 01
L#3 DoublesJo-Anne Salter / Sarah Ward vs Deepa Kayyar / Kelly McKee1-6, 0-6
2024-02-17vs Richmond Hill- KingLost 01
L#2 DoublesMeaghan Ryan / Sarah Ward vs Brianne Yontz / Patricia Maggioni4-6, 1-6
2024-01-27vs SCC-BellmoreLost 01
L#3 DoublesMargaret Cribbs / Sarah Ward vs Mo Dixon / Marti Brown0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Rachel Ober
published
3.38
Catherine DeJesus
published 3.5
3.36
Clara Fishel
published 3.5
3.34
Jo-Anne Salter
published
3.31
Lisa Hiatt
published
3.31
Carol Herringer
published 3.5
3.30
Karen Terrell
published
3.21
Holly Wilkerson
published 3.5
3.13
3.12
Sarah Ward
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.04
Nancy Cavallo
published
2.90
Margaret Cribbs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Ward + Carol Herringer4450% games+14.0% vs expected
Jo-Anne Salter + Lisa Hiatt3356% games+5.6% vs expected
Lori Schrimshaw-Becker + Sarah Ward2346% games+3.0% vs expected
Lisa Hiatt + Rachel Ober2347% games+3.0% vs expected
Nancy Cavallo + Sarah Ward01138% games−6.4% vs expected
Lisa Hiatt + Carol Herringer3444% games−6.8% vs expected
Sarah Ward + Margaret Cribbs2734% games−7.7% vs expected
Jo-Anne Salter + Carol Herringer0543% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Ober
21W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Catherine DeJesus
26W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Clara Fishel
37W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
Jo-Anne Salter
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
Lisa Hiatt
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Carol Herringer
25W–42L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Karen Terrell
19W–20L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Holly Wilkerson
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
Lori Schrimshaw-Becker
8W–16L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.13
3
Sarah Ward
126W–138L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.12
Nancy Cavallo
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
Margaret Cribbs
38W–43L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.