Teams

Braud/55/3.5/WD/SOAC

2025 BR Adult 55 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 BR (55&O) Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-17vs Bordelon/55/3.5/WD/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngel Ellis / Cynthia Baker vs Dana Baggett / Georgette Fontenot1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIngrid Osuna / Brooke Dynes vs Marcia Weger / Brenda Felps4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Garland / Donna Erwin vs Lisa Bordelon / Dee Bullock3-6, 0-6
2025-03-10vs Mackay/55/3.5/WD/BRECLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrooke Dynes / Donna Erwin vs Janet Babin / MaryClaire Hotard6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJeannette Braud / Ingrid Osuna vs Gerry MacKay / Lisa Loupe6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Garland / Jean Gremillion vs Kelly Obrien / Kellye Moody1-6, 4-6
2025-02-26vs Johnson/55/3.5/WD/YMCALost 03
L#1 DoublesJeannette Braud / Ingrid Osuna vs Patty Newton / Suzanne Wortmann6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngel Ellis / Lisa Garland vs Corey Gaffney / Holly Bordelon3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesStaci Buhler / Cynthia Baker vs Shelly Guidry / Rosalynn Landes4-6, 1-6
2025-02-17vs Bordelon/55/3.5/WD/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeannette Braud / Ingrid Osuna vs Dana Baggett / Georgette Fontenot2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAngel Ellis / Shivonne Wren vs Lisa Bordelon / Kerri Howard0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Garland / Patti Nelson vs Kelly Magnon / Marcia Weger6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-02-10vs Mackay/55/3.5/WD/BRECLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrooke Dynes / Donna Erwin vs Gerry MacKay / Barbara Morris6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesIngrid Osuna / Patti Nelson vs Lisa Loupe / Katherine Overland5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeannette Braud / Jean Gremillion vs Debora K Hartman / MaryClaire Hotard2-6, 3-6
2025-02-03vs Johnson/55/3.5/WD/YMCALost 03
L#1 DoublesBrooke Dynes / Donna Erwin vs Lise Sperling / Suzanne Wortmann3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeannette Braud / Ingrid Osuna vs Holly Bordelon / Michelle Quinn1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStaci Buhler / Shivonne Wren vs Corey Gaffney / Jennifer Johnson4-6, 2-6
2025-02-01vs Bordelon/55/3.5/WD/BRECLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeannette Braud / Brooke Dynes vs Kelly Magnon / Cynthia Chustz5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatti Nelson / Lisa Garland vs Brenda Felps / Georgette Fontenot3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Erwin / Katherine Hines vs Tanyau Hughes / Marcia Weger6-4, 7-5
2025-01-25vs Mackay/55/3.5/WD/BRECWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeannette Braud / Ingrid Osuna vs Lisa Loupe / Diane Hebert6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStaci Buhler / Lisa Garland vs Debora K Hartman / MaryClaire Hotard4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrooke Dynes / Donna Erwin vs Janet Babin / Kellye Moody6-0, 6-3
2025-01-17vs Johnson/55/3.5/WD/YMCALost 03
L#1 DoublesAngel Ellis / Lisa Garland vs Beth Shoptaugh / Terry Parker1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShivonne Wren / Staci Buhler vs Marie Nola / Rosalynn Landes4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeannette Braud / Donna Erwin vs Lise Sperling / Suzanne Wortmann3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 BR (55&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Brooke Dynes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.20
Katherine Hines
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Donna Erwin
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.06
Ingrid Osuna
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.02
Jeannette Braud
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Angel Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.72
Jean Gremillion
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Shivonne Wren
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Cynthia Baker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Janie Loftus
published
Patti Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Staci Buhler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Erwin + Brooke Dynes4452% games+6.1% vs expected
Ingrid Osuna + Angel Ellis2342% games−2.1% vs expected
Donna Erwin + Katherine Hines3249% games−3.9% vs expected
Jeannette Braud + Ingrid Osuna1538% games−5.9% vs expected
Donna Erwin + Jeannette Braud044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brooke Dynes
15W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
Katherine Hines
12W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Donna Erwin
12W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Ingrid Osuna
5W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jeannette Braud
13W–32L career · 8 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Angel Ellis
4W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
Jean Gremillion
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Shivonne Wren
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Cynthia Baker
6W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Janie Loftus
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patti Nelson
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Staci Buhler
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.