Teams

Snap/Murfreesboro

2026 Mixed 40 & Over- Murfreesboro · 4.0 Mixed 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-28vs Lund/MurfreesboroWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaura Wilson / Ryan Reeve vs Thomas Goodwyn / Kelly Horna3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEdith Kirkland / Hitesh Dhingra vs John McCall / Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChris Kelley / Ann Marie Dixon vs Jeanine Dyer / Stuart Littleton6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-26vs McLaughlin/Laney/MurfreesboroWon 30
W#1 DoublesJonathan Mattise / Edith Kirkland vs Norbert Molnar / Cindy Mccullough4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Snap / Chris Kelley vs William Jones / Julie Segura6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Wilson / Igor Shalkevich vs Donna Leedle / Eric Howser7-6, 6-2
2026-07-24vs Lund/MurfreesboroWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Goodson / Jonathan Mattise vs David Goodwin / Janet Prentice6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarrie Jones / Jim Kang vs Kelly Lee / Matt McCord6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBarbee Morgan / Jerry Tassa I vs Tonia Porter / Chad Porter4-6, 4-6
2026-06-27vs Lund/MurfreesboroWon 30
W#1 DoublesHitesh Dhingra / Carrie Jones vs Matt Lund / Alicia Zimmer7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrandon Dixon / Ann Marie Dixon vs Seth Strickland / Kelly Lee6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJason Snap / Stephanie Snap vs Jan Phanthalangsy / David Goodwin6-4, 6-4
2026-06-26vs McLaughlin/Laney/MurfreesboroWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrandon Dixon / Ann Marie Dixon vs William Jones / Cindy Mccullough6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJerry Tassa I / Carrie Jones vs Douglas McLaughlin / Heather Laney6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJason Snap / Edith Kirkland vs Shannon Smith / Christopher Oubre6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Mixed 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Snap/Murfreesboro601627111
2McLaughlin/Laney/Murfreesboro2461225182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Igor Shalkevich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Brandon Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.97
Katherine Goodson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Ryan Reeve
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Jerry Tassa I
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Jason Snap
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Barbee Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Hitesh Dhingra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Jim Kang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Ann Marie Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Edith Kirkland
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Stephanie Snap
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Jonathan Mattise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Snap + Jason Snap3254% gamesnot enough data
Brandon Dixon + Ann Marie Dixon404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Igor Shalkevich
27W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
4
Brandon Dixon
11W–11L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
4.01
Katherine Goodson
44W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
Ryan Reeve
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
Jerry Tassa I
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.89
Jason Snap
26W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Barbee Morgan
33W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Hitesh Dhingra
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.77
Jim Kang
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Ann Marie Dixon
22W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Edith Kirkland
19W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Stephanie Snap
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.64
Jonathan Mattise
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.