Teams

IHCC-GARVIN

2026 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · 3.0 Women Day Friday

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-27vs IHCC-GROSSNICKLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Garvin / Nicole Prine vs Betsy Slocumb / Emily Battle7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLori Brewer / Lesley Clarke vs Barbara Jenkins / Cathy Driver6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAbigail Moody / Alyssa Syribeys vs Katie Durkee / Ashley Thillainathan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-20vs IHCC-SHARPTONLost 23
L#1 DoublesMindy Jones / Lesley Clarke vs Haley Claxton / Jennifer Butler6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Prine vs Libby Peterson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaige Parker / Georgia Canipe vs Carla Cox / Mary Woodward6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesAlyssa Syribeys vs Katie Parel7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Taylor / Macie Walker Morrison vs Ellen Duggan / Nancy Kight4-6, 1-6
2026-03-13vs HOCO-JOHNSONLost 12
W#1 SinglesNicole Prine vs Stacylee Johnson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Hinson / Alyssa Syribeys vs Rachel Preston / Stevie Rigby1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLori Brewer / Macie Walker Morrison vs Francine Sauer / Roberta Brett2-6, 2-6
2026-03-06vs IHCC-JONESWon 31
W#1 DoublesAlyssa Syribeys / Mindy Jones vs Betsy Slocumb / Melissa Jones6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesNicole Prine vs Katie Durkee4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMacie Walker Morrison / Georgia Canipe vs Nancy Long / Cathy Driver6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAbigail Moody / Marcelina Easom vs Mary Katz / Audrea Boyd6-3, 6-1
2026-03-05vs IHCC-SHARPTONWon 31
L#1 DoublesAlyssa Syribeys / Macie Walker Morrison vs Anna Sharpton / Haley Claxton0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNicole Prine vs Jen Traino6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMindy Jones / Lesley Clarke vs Jenni Eddlemon / Holly Leachman6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAbigail Moody / Liz Hill vs Patricia Waite / Katie Hatcher6-0, 6-1
2026-02-20vs HOCO-JOHNSONSplit 11
W#2 DoublesGeorgia Canipe / Paige Parker vs Helen Nicholson / Gracie Preston Rigby7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLesley Clarke / Macie Walker Morrison vs Alpa Patel / Melanie Herrington3-6, 3-6
2026-02-13vs IHCC-JONESWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlyssa Syribeys / Mindy Jones vs Cathy Driver / Melissa Jones6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNicole Prine vs Ashley Thillainathan6-1, 6-1
2026-02-06vs IHCC-SHARPTONSplit 11
W#2 SinglesNicole Prine vs Hyunji Schneibel6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAbigail Moody / Marcelina Easom vs Carla Cox / Mary Woodward2-6, 2-6
2026-01-30vs HOCO-JOHNSONLost 02
L#1 DoublesNicole Prine / Katie Garvin vs Francine Sauer / Stacylee Johnson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarcelina Easom / Alyssa Syribeys vs Rolonda Gaskins / Helen Nicholson1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Day Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Nicole Prine
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
2.84
Lesley Clarke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Emily Hinson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.75
Georgia Canipe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Abigail Moody
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Katie Garvin
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.67
Liz Hill
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.67
Teresa HURT
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.56
Alyssa Syribeys
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.41
Marcelina Easom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Macie Walker Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jennifer Taylor
published
Mindy Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Garvin + Nicole Prine123 matchesnot enough data
Emily Hinson + Alyssa Syribeys033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Prine
22W–16L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Lesley Clarke
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Emily Hinson
24W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Georgia Canipe
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Abigail Moody
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Katie Garvin
10W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Liz Hill
7W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Teresa HURT
6W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
2.5
Alyssa Syribeys
11W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
Marcelina Easom
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41
Macie Walker Morrison
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
Jennifer Taylor
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mindy Jones
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.