Teams

CCV- DnR Butler

2024 Richmond Combo Weekday · Richmond Combo Weekday 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-18vs ACAC BradtSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAmanda Galanti / Hayes Blackburn vs Sonya Carman / Irene Quilez6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlison Avery / Kirsti Goodwin vs Victoria Bradt / Alicia Watkins6-7
2024-11-13vs WW Double Trouble - RacelisLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmanda Galanti / Robin Reifsnider vs Brigitte Fanelli / Britta Petersson4-6, 2-4
2024-11-04vs SCC Coon ComboWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmanda Galanti / Kirsti Goodwin vs Becky McNeer / Julie Nobles6-2, 6-0
2024-11-01vs TDC 7.5 BraggLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlison Avery / Kirsti Goodwin vs Heidi Collier / Justine Sherman1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-10-28vs Hermitage WilliamsLost 01
L#2 DoublesHayes Blackburn / Amanda Galanti vs Joanna Bergeron / Addie Miller4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekday 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Katherine Shiveley
published
3.80
Amanda Galanti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Hayes Blackburn
published
3.71
Emily Gottwald
published
3.65
Alison Avery
published 4
3.59
Anne Henry
published 4.5
3.01
Kirsti Goodwin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Donna Butler
published
Emily Edens
published
Robin Reifsnider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Avery + Amanda Galanti5063% games+1.9% vs expected
Kirsti Goodwin + Amanda Galanti224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Shiveley
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.12
4
Amanda Galanti
85W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Hayes Blackburn
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Emily Gottwald
19W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.71
4
Alison Avery
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
4.5
Anne Henry
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.59
Kirsti Goodwin
56W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Donna Butler
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Emily Edens
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robin Reifsnider
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.