Teams

Bell

2026 Leon Adult 18 & Over · 2.5W Adult 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-25vs WaltonWon 20
W#1 DoublesLena Juarez / Jennifer Slocum vs Stephanie Hodges / Jeanne Ware6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennie Merchant vs Emily Barrow6-2, 6-1
2026-06-18vs WaltonLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Kosberg / Cyndi Knox vs Jeanne Ware / Ruby Williams2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJennie Merchant vs Katie Walton1-6, 5-7
2026-06-11vs WaltonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Winokur / Jennifer Slocum vs Jeanne Ware / Stephanie Hodges6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesShelly Bell / Sarah Kosberg vs Emily Barrow / Diana Allee4-6, 5-7
2026-06-04vs WaltonWon 20
W#1 DoublesLucy Clay Mcgehee / Lena Juarez vs Diana Allee / Stephanie Hodges6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarla Vickers / Jennie Merchant vs Raquel England / Kara Hackney6-3, 6-1
2026-05-28vs WaltonLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Kosberg / Lucy Clay Mcgehee vs Heemanshi Shah-lakshmin / Jeanne Ware6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennie Merchant vs Katie Walton6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Slocum / Cyndi Knox vs Raquel England / Kara Hackney6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2026-05-21vs WaltonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarla Vickers / Jennie Merchant vs Jeanne Ware / Diana Allee5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Slocum / Shelly Bell vs Heemanshi Shah-lakshmin / Emily Barrow3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-05-14vs WaltonLost 12
L#1 DoublesLucy Clay Mcgehee / Jennifer Slocum vs Ruby Williams / Stephanie Hodges1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJennie Merchant vs Katie Walton4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Kosberg / Cyndi Knox vs Heemanshi Shah-lakshmin / Emily Barrow6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Marla Vickers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Jennie Merchant
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.49
Michelle Winokur
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Lena Juarez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Cyndi Knox
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.31
Jennifer Slocum
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.31
Sarah Kosberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.17
Lucy Clay Mcgehee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marla Vickers
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.79
Jennie Merchant
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
Michelle Winokur
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Lena Juarez
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
2.5
Cyndi Knox
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.44
Jennifer Slocum
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Sarah Kosberg
0W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Lucy Clay Mcgehee
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.