Teams

STC-Ritze

2026 OH OV WINTER A18&O · 2026 Winter A18&O 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-09vs STC-CaseyLost 14
W#1 DoublesCharles Petsch / Todd Haines vs Matthew Casey / Mason Hagen1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMike Ritze vs Benjamin Mishler2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Penny / Brandon Workman vs David Marchus / Jeremy O'neill6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRob Hagelberg vs Francisco Herrera1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesIsiac Lee / Kane Feltner vs Brady Hagan / Takuma Furukawa2-6, 4-6
2026-03-22vs QRRC-DowseSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMike Ritze / Charles Petsch vs Rubinder Dab / Jansen Meyers7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Stankas / Todd Haines vs Travis Fox / Shaun Johannes1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEric Salter vs Jeffrey Nabholz3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrandon Workman / Rob Hagelberg vs Rodolfo Aguilera / Ariz Anklesaria7-6, 7-6
2026-03-08vs KTC-KeatonWon 50
W#1 DoublesTodd Haines / Michael Stankas vs Joseph Drapalik / Robert Walker6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesEric Holterman vs Andy Bremer6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEric Salter / Brandon Workman vs William Boatwright Jr / Andy Hostetter6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesBryan Ulery vs Daniel Grant6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMike Ritze / Thomas Penny vs Dave Keaton / Robert Kastler6-0, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 Winter A18&O 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Todd Haines
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Eric Holterman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Eric Salter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.39
Michael Stankas
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Mike Ritze
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Charles Petsch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Brandon Workman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Bryan Ulery
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Rob Hagelberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.76
Thomas Penny
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Kane Feltner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Isiac Lee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Todd Haines + Mike Ritze5161% games+7.1% vs expected
Mike Ritze + Charles Petsch10453% games+3.8% vs expected
Todd Haines + Michael Stankas7164% games−0.9% vs expected
Eric Salter + Charles Petsch1644% gamesnot enough data
Mike Ritze + Eric Holterman4159% gamesnot enough data
Kane Feltner + Isiac Lee1439% gamesnot enough data
Eric Salter + Mike Ritze314 matchesnot enough data
Todd Haines + Charles Petsch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Haines
78W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
Eric Holterman
67W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.40
Eric Salter
35W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Michael Stankas
51W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Mike Ritze
177W–103L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Charles Petsch
82W–64L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Brandon Workman
37W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Bryan Ulery
23W–46L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Rob Hagelberg
66W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Thomas Penny
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Kane Feltner
27W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Isiac Lee
25W–50L career · 6 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.