Teams

BHSC-Welch

2024 Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over · Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.56 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-28vs New Kids on the Block-LorenzoLost 01
L#3 DoublesPeter Welch / Merrily Main D'Arpino vs Christina Lorenzo / Tyler Chow2-6, 2-6
2024-05-10vs AHS Scared Hitless-LisWon 20
W#1 DoublesIan Caskill / Faith Zabek vs Ben Jorgensen / Pamela Jupin6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoey Hanning / Merrily Main D'Arpino vs Bram Braakman / Stacy Moren7-5, 6-1
2024-04-28vs New Kids on the Block-LorenzoWon 10
W#1 DoublesIan Caskill / Merrily Main D'Arpino vs Tyler Chow / Megan Murr6-4, 6-2
2024-03-17vs ACAC Breaking Bad-BaylissWon 10
W#2 DoublesIan Caskill / Faith Zabek vs Gregory Parrish / Beverly Sweeney6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Evanow
published 4
3.74
Ian Caskill
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.52
David Burns
published 3.5
3.47
Todd Hochrein
published
3.46
Kelley Ryan
published
3.39
Shannon Henderson
published
3.28
Courtney Heyward
published 3.5
Bill Evanow
published 3.5
3.23
Faith Zabek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Merrily Main D'Arpino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Diane Burns
published 3
2.95
Gina Mancuso
published
Jay Kolbrener
published
Peter Welch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ian Caskill + Faith Zabek8262% games+18.0% vs expected
David Burns + Diane Burns224 matchesnot enough data
Merrily Main D'Arpino + Ian Caskill404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison Evanow
1W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Ian Caskill
71W–43L career · 10 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
3.5
David Burns
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Todd Hochrein
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.47
Kelley Ryan
18W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Shannon Henderson
27W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Courtney Heyward
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Bill Evanow
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Faith Zabek
41W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Merrily Main D'Arpino
150W–107L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Diane Burns
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Gina Mancuso
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
Jay Kolbrener
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Welch
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.