Teams

kang/vitrano/18/3.5/NON/XU

2025 NO Adult 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-19vs Morris/18/3.5/NON/CPLost 14
L#1 DoublesJulia Novack / Raelynn Loop vs Paige Giavotella / Jessica Barnett7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGeorgie McBride vs Claire Nance Kurzweg2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGoudeau Renee / Ji Kang vs Shelley Adams / Laura Bernard1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSvetlana Crouch vs Shannon Morris6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChana Lewis / Carrie Armstrong vs Brook Kerrigan / Anne Hughs2-6, 5-7
2025-03-17vs Stone/18/3.5/NON/GACCLost 23
L#1 DoublesKristi Trail / Chana Lewis vs Kym Valene / Monica Grimaldi3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJi Kang vs Jaime Lambert1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSvetlana Crouch / Lauren Averill vs Jen Staley / Jenny Stone1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesShannon Marino vs Leslie McMichael2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRaelynn Loop / Julia Novack vs Katy Wittmann / Ami Brown6-3, 7-5
2025-02-05vs Bollman/18/3.5/NON/AkStLost 23
L#1 DoublesGoudeau Renee / Julia Glorioso vs Stephanie Blakemore / Therese Gremillion1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesGeorgie McBride vs Kellen Murphy3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulia Novack / Raelynn Loop vs Sara Blakemore / Molly Joubert4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesPam Vitrano vs Mallory Barkerding6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSvetlana Crouch / Kim Kerner vs Meaghan Murphy / Anna Stenger5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 NO (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Julia Novack
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
3.21
Rebekah Teesdale
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.10
Shannon Marino
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.10
Goudeau Renee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Pam Vitrano
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.97
Svetlana Crouch
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Kristi Trail
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Kim Kerner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Carrie Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chana Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Ji Kang
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Georgie McBride
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Julia Glorioso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Averill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Raelynn Loop
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Kerner + Svetlana Crouch2348% gamesnot enough data
Svetlana Crouch + Rebekah Teesdale213 matchesnot enough data
Raelynn Loop + Julia Novack123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Novack
25W–26L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Rebekah Teesdale
35W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Shannon Marino
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Goudeau Renee
8W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Pam Vitrano
15W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Svetlana Crouch
18W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Kristi Trail
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
Kim Kerner
9W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Carrie Armstrong
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Chana Lewis
3W–6L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ji Kang
1W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.71
Georgie McBride
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julia Glorioso
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Averill
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Raelynn Loop
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.