Teams

GEPTA/Colbert/Trilevel/3.0-4.0W

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2024 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Erika Delgado
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.83
Allison Glass
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Fabiola P Hinojos
usually #1 Doubles 61%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.45
Daniela Cano
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.29
Ana Lucia Sanchez
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3.5
ALMA HERRERA
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published 3.5
3.25
Ivette Acosta
usually #1 Singles 47%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.03
Daniela Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Kate Colbert
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Monica Medina
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Valerie Santos
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Delgado + Kate Colbert12460% gamesnot enough data
Monica Medina + Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca6355% gamesnot enough data
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca + Allison Glass4170% gamesnot enough data
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca + Ana Lucia Sanchez3259% gamesnot enough data
Fabiola P Hinojos + Kate Colbert303 matchesnot enough data
Monica Medina + Ivette Acosta213 matchesnot enough data
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca + Ivette Acosta123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erika Delgado
107W–52L career · 23 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Allison Glass
30W–7L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Fabiola P Hinojos
23W–9L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Daniela Cano
39W–20L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Ana Lucia Sanchez
22W–9L career · 11 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
ALMA HERRERA
23W–15L career · 29 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Ivette Acosta
22W–28L career · 17 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Daniela Ortiz
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.03
Kate Colbert
52W–23L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
44W–31L career · 19 lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Medina
38W–24L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Valerie Santos
129W–67L career · 24 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.