Teams

Team 2 RJ Net Assets.

2022 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over · NOVA Tri Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-06vs Team 6 Queens of the CourtLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Boulineaux / Joyce Aramburu vs Jennifer Decker / Nicole Lefton3-6, 3-6
2022-10-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Boulineaux / Miriam Smolen vs Patricia Michel-Vargas / Lisa Handy6-2, 6-4
2022-10-13vs Team 1 Haven AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoyce Aramburu / Genevieve Raphael vs Liz Bowman / KATIE MEERSTEIN4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-08vs Team 8 GreatTriWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarcy Davidson / Miriam Smolen vs Kathy Potter / Leanne Smith6-0, 6-2
2022-10-06vs Team 9Won 10
W#3 DoublesMiriam Smolen / Joyce Aramburu vs Wendy Wicker / Chie Takahashi6-2, 6-1
2022-09-17vs Team 4 Triple ThreatLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarrie Fleming / Miriam Smolen vs Alison Lopez / Nancy Sicairos3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Debra Pickus
published 3.5
2.90
Carrie Fleming
published 3
2.76
Lynne Aoyama
published
2.71
Theresa Jones
published
2.56
Marcy Davidson
published
2.46
Joyce Aramburu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.45
Miriam Smolen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Karen Boulineaux
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miriam Smolen + Joyce Aramburu91948% games−1.8% vs expected
Joyce Aramburu + Theresa Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debra Pickus
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Carrie Fleming
46W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
Lynne Aoyama
63W–54L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Genevieve Raphael
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Theresa Jones
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Marcy Davidson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Joyce Aramburu
78W–180L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.46
3
Miriam Smolen
49W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.45
Karen Boulineaux
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.