Teams

JVozella-CHCC

2026 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-28vs JSykes-CCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKristina Vrabel / Judi Seagroves vs Mary T Long / Terry Summers3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Vozella / Elizabeth Miller vs Alice Ratliff / Alise McNeill0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Oakley / Dorene Palermo vs Karen Bordeaux / LNDA T STEWART3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-21vs MGriffiths-CHTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaurie Oakley / Justine Zavaglia vs Christina Deprez / Sarah Ederle7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Sapeta / Elizabeth Miller vs Tracy Kinsey / Denise Stabenau6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Porter / Dorene Palermo vs Carol Davis / Mary Griffiths3-6, 0-0
2026-04-07vs DWebb-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Sapeta / Justine Zavaglia vs Nancy Stovall / Jan Hagerty6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Gilchrist / Laura Porter vs Barbara Howe / Brenda Pratt2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKathryn Chan / Dorene Palermo vs Camille Blommer / Donna Webb6-2, 7-6
2026-03-31vs JMader-HRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Vozella / Karol Wenner vs June Mader / Doris Stam2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Gilchrist / Justine Zavaglia vs Jan ORegan / Jennifer Edmunds6-1, 6-4
2026-03-28vs YDeaver-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Sapeta / Kristina Vrabel vs Claire Blackwelder / Yolanda Deaver3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Gilchrist / Laura Porter vs Debbie Baker / Karen Maus5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Miller / Dorene Palermo vs Polly Hilsabeck / Janet Ranheim0-6, 1-6
2026-03-24vs JSykes-CCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Sapeta / Kristina Vrabel vs Anne Brady / LNDA T STEWART7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJustine Zavaglia / Laura Porter vs Mary T Long / Teresa Ritter6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Vozella / Judi Seagroves vs Alise McNeill / Alice Ratliff3-6, 2-6
2026-03-10vs CCleary-HRLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Vozella / Sarah Sapeta vs Ann Rauchbach / Doreen Sanfelici2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDorene Palermo / Judi Seagroves vs Kathleen Fitts / Cindy Rossitch2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Miller / Kathryn Chan vs Cindy Cleary / Cheryl Bock6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2026-03-03vs MGriffiths-CHTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJustine Zavaglia / Linda Gilchrist vs Mindy Miller / Sarah Ederle3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathryn Chan / Kristina Vrabel vs Tracy Kinsey / Melissa McCullough6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLaurie Oakley / Karol Wenner vs Denise Stabenau / Carla Wertheimer5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Kristina Vrabel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Kathryn Chan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Laura Porter
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Sarah Sapeta
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Linda Gilchrist
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Justine Zavaglia
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Dorene Palermo
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.61
Laurie Oakley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Judi Seagroves
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Karol Wenner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Julie Vozella
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Vozella + Laurie Oakley3350% games+4.7% vs expected
Dorene Palermo + Judi Seagroves134 matchesnot enough data
Kristina Vrabel + Sarah Sapeta224 matchesnot enough data
Linda Gilchrist + Laura Porter134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristina Vrabel
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Kathryn Chan
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Laura Porter
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Sarah Sapeta
95W–89L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Linda Gilchrist
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Justine Zavaglia
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Dorene Palermo
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
Laurie Oakley
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Judi Seagroves
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Karol Wenner
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Julie Vozella
5W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.