Teams

CP WHITE

2023 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-17vs SS-G BLUEWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesPaige Lindquist / Chelsea Taylor vs Gina Uhrich / Ilana Bellowe6-2, 6-3
2023-07-10vs LEBTC PURPLEWon 10
W#2 Female SinglesLauren Hanzlik vs Madison Irvine6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-03Won 30
W#1 Female DoublesAnnalisa Averill / Chelsea Taylor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 Female SinglesPaige Lindquist vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 Female SinglesJess Yarbrough vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-26vs BP GREENWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesLauren Hanzlik / Lisa Christman vs Megan Aliffi / Clarissa Manzi6-2, 6-0
W#1 Female SinglesPaige Lindquist vs Molly Buller6-3, 6-3
W#2 Female SinglesJess Yarbrough vs Nancy Zhong6-4, 7-6
2023-06-19Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesLauren Hanzlik / Annalisa Averill vs Daria Opekunova / Paige Foy6-0, 6-0
2023-06-05vs LPTC GREENLost 01
L#2 Female SinglesJess Yarbrough vs Michelle Dolin0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Lauren Hanzlik
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Singles 33% · published 4
3.73
Lisa Christman
published
3.54
Annalisa Averill
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Paige Lindquist
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Kate Hanson
published
2.93
Chelsea Taylor
published 3
2.56
Jess Yarbrough
usually #2 Female Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annalisa Averill + Lauren Hanzlik11367% games+13.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lauren Hanzlik
100W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
Lisa Christman
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%5%95%
3.73
3.5
Annalisa Averill
76W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Paige Lindquist
57W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%61%38%
3.46
Kate Hanson
25W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3
Chelsea Taylor
15W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
2.5
Jess Yarbrough
20W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%34%66%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.