← Teams

MAC-Lekas/Knox

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.39 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Jeffrey Bayless
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
JOHN KNOX
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Jim Lekas
published 3.5
3.25
Mark Hudspeth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Philip Flemming
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
William Reykalin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Tony Humpage
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Matthew Casimo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Mike Delman
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-05-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJOHN KNOX / Michael McCarthy vs James Horen / Randall Sinn6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Mike Delman vs William Pettis / Makoto Sakaguchi6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDave Hall / William Reykalin vs Greg van Gasse / Mitchell Todd6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-09Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesTony Humpage / JOHN KNOX vs Steven Keo / James Takahashi3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMike Delman / Mark Mitchell vs Richard Gronostajski / Terence Gariety6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Mark Hudspeth vs Neal Burgstahler / Dale Christensen6-2, 6-2
2025-05-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMark Hudspeth / JOHN KNOX vs Robin Olson / Jeff Wheeler6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDave Hall / Matthew Casimo vs Brian Harvey / Daniel Rousseau6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMike Delman / Michael McCarthy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Mike Delman vs Michael Archer / Peter Monsantofils5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhilip Flemming / Mark Hudspeth vs Michael Lavios / Stephen Reder6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJOHN KNOX / Dave Hall vs Danny Denning / Robert Hesslink7-6, 6-2
2025-04-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKevin Young / William Reykalin vs Robin Olson / Jeff Wheeler6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTony Humpage / Chip Burczak vs Craig Frasier / John Bergin6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Mike Delman vs Brian Harvey / Jeff Gonzales6-0, 6-3
2025-04-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Chip Burczak vs Craig Tompkins / David Park6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMike Delman / Mark Hudspeth vs Dale Vandenburgh / James Stenger6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMatthew Casimo / William Reykalin vs Tommy Atkins / Robert Wendland6-2, 7-6
2025-04-03Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTony Humpage / Chip Burczak vs Rick Raivio / Rolf Ellingsen6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMichael McCarthy / Mike Delman vs Bruce Yang / Robert Shevlin1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-25Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesMark Mitchell / Tony Humpage vs Steve Russell / Gregory Foster6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Dave Hall vs Alan Jones / Mister Archedon7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jeffrey Bayless
130W–100L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
JOHN KNOX
23W–18L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jim Lekas
22W–12L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Mark Hudspeth
5W–10L career
8%87%5%
3.25
3.5
Philip Flemming
4W–11L career
not enough data
—
3.5
William Reykalin
5W–14L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Tony Humpage
99W–73L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3
Matthew Casimo
40W–103L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Mike Delman
4W–8L career
8%87%5%
2.75

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.