Teams

JVanDeWater(55+ Combo)

2022 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 8.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-10vs JDiamond 8.5 comboLost 01
L#3 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Eric Herr vs Ken Lawton / Scott Anderson3-6, 3-6
2022-10-03vs IJSageSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDayn Harum / Chris Saillant vs John van Campen / Tony Houser4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Linh Nguyen vs Joe Murphy / Jason Sage7-6, 7-6
2022-09-28vs IJSageWon 10
W#1 DoublesDayn Harum / Michael Marchi vs Mark Camacho / Tony Houser7-6, 6-1
2022-09-26vs JMADIASplit 11
W#1 DoublesDayn Harum / Chris Saillant vs Randy Lakey / Tom Larrichio7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEric Herr / John VanDeWater vs David Bell / Jeffrey Romeo2-6, 4-6
2022-09-19vs JDiamond 8.5 comboSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Dayn Harum vs Ken Lawton / Hai Le6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLinh Nguyen / Chris Saillant vs Scott Anderson / Tom Sparks6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-08-29vs JMADIALost 12
W#1 DoublesDayn Harum / Michael Marchi vs Roger Kurtz / Duncan McGrew7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSteven Miller / Chris Saillant vs Tom Larrichio / W Troutman0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLinh Nguyen / John VanDeWater vs Steve Faltz / Dirk German1-6, 1-6
2022-08-22vs JDiamond 8.5 comboWon 10
W#2 DoublesRay Goldberg / Dayn Harum vs John Diamond / Ken Nowell6-2, 7-6
2022-08-16vs JMADIASplit 11
W#2 DoublesSteven Miller / Chris Saillant vs Randy Lakey / Tom Larrichio2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Daniel Murphy vs Roger Kurtz / Duncan McGrew2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Dayn Harum
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.75
Michael Marchi
published
3.73
Chris Saillant
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
John VanDeWater
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.54
Ray Goldberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John VanDeWater + Dayn Harum9557% games+5.3% vs expected
Ray Goldberg + Dayn Harum303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dayn Harum
71W–32L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
4.04
Michael Marchi
15W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Chris Saillant
70W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
John VanDeWater
149W–114L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.69
Ray Goldberg
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.